Judith E. Pegg

644 total citations
8 papers, 423 citations indexed

About

Judith E. Pegg is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Judith E. Pegg has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 423 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Judith E. Pegg's work include Language Development and Disorders (7 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (5 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers). Judith E. Pegg is often cited by papers focused on Language Development and Disorders (7 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (5 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers). Judith E. Pegg collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Judith E. Pegg's co-authors include Janet F. Werker, Peter J. McLeod, Linda Polka, Valerie L. Lloyd, Rushen Shi and Christine L. Stager and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Infant Behavior and Development and Open Collections.

In The Last Decade

Judith E. Pegg

7 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Judith E. Pegg Canada	4	328	233	100	97	37	8	423
Emily Hill United States	4	357 1.1×	175 0.8×	75 0.8×	108 1.1×	19 0.5×	4	444
Rory A. DePaolis United States	14	656 2.0×	384 1.6×	72 0.7×	195 2.0×	42 1.1×	24	779
Laurel Fais Canada	9	271 0.8×	226 1.0×	33 0.3×	73 0.8×	37 1.0×	20	346
Katherine A. Yoshida United States	6	432 1.3×	319 1.4×	33 0.3×	141 1.5×	37 1.0×	8	511
E I Stolyarova United States	2	438 1.3×	390 1.7×	86 0.9×	152 1.6×	99 2.7×	7	641
Mary R. Smith United States	4	360 1.1×	353 1.5×	43 0.4×	102 1.1×	68 1.8×	7	520
Satsuki Nakai United Kingdom	8	301 0.9×	279 1.2×	28 0.3×	100 1.0×	85 2.3×	18	501
Christine L. Matyear United States	9	270 0.8×	276 1.2×	34 0.3×	56 0.6×	31 0.8×	10	374
Ann Marie Jusczyk United States	8	789 2.4×	446 1.9×	72 0.7×	207 2.1×	45 1.2×	10	901
Tamar Keren‐Portnoy United Kingdom	13	572 1.7×	260 1.1×	72 0.7×	135 1.4×	36 1.0×	34	650

Countries citing papers authored by Judith E. Pegg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith E. Pegg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith E. Pegg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith E. Pegg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith E. Pegg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith E. Pegg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith E. Pegg. The network helps show where Judith E. Pegg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith E. Pegg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith E. Pegg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith E. Pegg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith E. Pegg. Judith E. Pegg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Werker, Janet F., Valerie L. Lloyd, Judith E. Pegg, & Linda Polka. (2014). Putting the Baby in the Bootstraps: Toward a More Complete Understanding of the Role of the Input in Infant Speech Processing. 439–460. 3 indexed citations

2.

Pegg, Judith E.. (2009). Adult and infant perception of an English phonetic distinction. Open Collections.

3.

Werker, Janet F., Judith E. Pegg, Rushen Shi, & Christine L. Stager. (1998). Updates on becoming a native listener. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 103(5_Supplement). 2932–2932. 1 indexed citations

4.

Pegg, Judith E. & Janet F. Werker. (1997). Adult and infant perception of two English phones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 102(6). 3742–3753. 96 indexed citations

5.

Werker, Janet F., Linda Polka, & Judith E. Pegg. (1997). The conditioned head turn procedure as a method for testing infant speech perception. 6(3-4). 171–178. 43 indexed citations

6.

Werker, Janet F., Linda Polka, & Judith E. Pegg. (1997). The conditioned head turn procedure as a method for testing infant speech perception. 6(34). 171–178. 1 indexed citations

7.

Werker, Janet F., Judith E. Pegg, & Peter J. McLeod. (1994). A cross-language investigation of infant preference for infant-directed communication. Infant Behavior and Development. 17(3). 323–333. 119 indexed citations

8.

Pegg, Judith E., Janet F. Werker, & Peter J. McLeod. (1992). Preference for infant-directed over adult-directed speech: Evidence from 7-week-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 15(3). 325–345. 160 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact