Mary P. Latimer

671 total citations
21 papers, 524 citations indexed

About

Mary P. Latimer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary P. Latimer has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 524 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Mary P. Latimer's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers). Mary P. Latimer is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers). Mary P. Latimer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Mary P. Latimer's co-authors include Philip Winn, Helen L. Alderson, Claire Taylor, Rouba Kozak, Rachel B. Whitelaw, Wendy L. Inglis, Verity J. Brown, Charles D. Blaha, Anthony G. Phillips and Daniel S. Zahm and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Neuroscience and Journal of Neurochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mary P. Latimer

21 papers receiving 520 citations

Peers

Mary P. Latimer
Duncan A. A. MacLaren United States
M Kungel Germany
Shao‐Pii Onn United States
Nathaniel A. Buchwald United States
Fulva Shah United States
Benjamin R. Micklem United Kingdom
Elad Lax Israel
Tara Wright United States
Duncan A. A. MacLaren United States
Mary P. Latimer
Citations per year, relative to Mary P. Latimer Mary P. Latimer (= 1×) peers Duncan A. A. MacLaren

Countries citing papers authored by Mary P. Latimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary P. Latimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary P. Latimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary P. Latimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary P. Latimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary P. Latimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary P. Latimer. The network helps show where Mary P. Latimer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary P. Latimer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary P. Latimer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary P. Latimer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary P. Latimer. Mary P. Latimer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Latimer, Mary P., et al.. (2011). Nicotine self-administered directly into the VTA by rats is weakly reinforcing but has strong reinforcement enhancing properties. Psychopharmacology. 220(1). 43–54. 8 indexed citations
2.
Bortolanza, Mariza, Evellyn Claudia Wietzikoski, Suelen L. Boschen, et al.. (2010). Functional disconnection of the substantia nigra pars compacta from the pedunculopontine nucleus impairs learning of a conditioned avoidance task. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 94(2). 229–239. 15 indexed citations
3.
Latimer, Mary P., et al.. (2008). The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?. BMC Neuroscience. 9(1). 16–16. 11 indexed citations
4.
Alderson, Helen L., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2008). A functional dissociation of the anterior and posterior pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: excitotoxic lesions have differential effects on locomotion and the response to nicotine. Brain Structure and Function. 213(1-2). 247–253. 37 indexed citations
5.
Clark, Stewart D., et al.. (2007). Fusion of diphtheria toxin and urotensin II produces a neurotoxin selective for cholinergic neurons in the rat mesopontine tegmentum. Journal of Neurochemistry. 102(1). 112–120. 30 indexed citations
6.
Alderson, Helen L., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2006). Intravenous self‐administration of nicotine is altered by lesions of the posterior, but not anterior, pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. European Journal of Neuroscience. 23(8). 2169–2175. 43 indexed citations
7.
Ainge, James A., Glenda L. Keating, Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2006). The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and responding for sucrose reward.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 120(3). 563–570. 14 indexed citations
8.
Alderson, Helen L., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2005). Involvement of the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus in the locomotor response to repeated nicotine administration. Neuroscience Letters. 380(3). 335–339. 22 indexed citations
9.
Taylor, Claire, Rouba Kozak, Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2004). Effects of changing reward on performance of the delayed spatial win-shift radial maze task in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesioned rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 153(2). 431–438. 27 indexed citations
10.
Kozak, Rouba, et al.. (2004). Excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in rats impair performance on a test of sustained attention. Experimental Brain Research. 162(2). 257–264. 31 indexed citations
11.
Latimer, Mary P., et al.. (2004). An examination of d-amphetamine self-administration in pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus-lesioned rats. Neuroscience. 125(2). 349–358. 40 indexed citations
12.
Taylor, Claire, Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2003). Impaired delayed spatial win-shift behaviour on the eight arm radial maze following excitotoxic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research. 147(1-2). 107–114. 50 indexed citations
13.
Latimer, Mary P., et al.. (2003). Behavioural sensitisation to repeated d-amphetamine: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. Neuroscience. 118(2). 311–315. 21 indexed citations
14.
15.
Jenkins, Trisha A., Mary P. Latimer, Helen L. Alderson, & Philip Winn. (2002). Determination of acetylcholine and dopamine content in thalamus and striatum after excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in rats. Neuroscience Letters. 322(1). 45–48. 11 indexed citations
16.
Alderson, Helen L., Trisha A. Jenkins, Rouba Kozak, Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2001). The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus on conditioned place preference to 4%, 12% and 20% sucrose solutions. Brain Research Bulletin. 56(6). 599–605. 23 indexed citations
17.
Zahm, Daniel S., Evelyn A. Williams, Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2001). Ventral mesopontine projections of the caudomedial shell of the nucleus accumbens and extended amygdala in the rat: Double dissociation by organization and development. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 436(1). 111–125. 1 indexed citations
18.
Phillips, Janice M., Mary P. Latimer, Sonali Gupta, Philip Winn, & Verity J. Brown. (1998). Excitotoxic lesions of the subthalamic nucleus ameliorate asymmetry induced by striatal dopamine depletion in the rat. Behavioural Brain Research. 90(1). 73–77. 14 indexed citations
19.
Brown, Verity J., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (1996). Memory for the changing cost of a reward is mediated by the sublenticular extended amygdala. Brain Research Bulletin. 39(3). 163–170. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026