Cláudio Da Cunha
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Reinaldo Ν. TakahashiIván IzquierdoJorge H. MedinaNewton S. CanterasMaria A.B.F. VitalRoberto AndreatiniPatrícia A. DombrowskiSuelen L. Boschen
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (56 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (34 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (34 papers)
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesArgentina
In The Last Decade
Cláudio Da Cunha
118 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.5k
- Neurology 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 770
- Neurology 505
Countries citing papers authored by Cláudio Da Cunha
This map shows the geographic impact of Cláudio Da Cunha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cláudio Da Cunha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cláudio Da Cunha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cláudio Da Cunha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cláudio Da Cunha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cláudio Da Cunha. The network helps show where Cláudio Da Cunha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cláudio Da Cunha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cláudio Da Cunha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cláudio Da Cunha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cláudio Da Cunha. Cláudio Da Cunha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 96 | |
| 14 | 62 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 91 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Cláudio Da Cunha
Cláudio Da Cunha is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 118 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (56 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (34 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (34 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.5k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (409 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (220 citations). Cláudio Da Cunha has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Reinaldo Ν. Takahashi, Iván Izquierdo, Jorge H. Medina, Newton S. Canteras, Maria A.B.F. Vital, Roberto Andreatini, Patrícia A. Dombrowski, Suelen L. Boschen, Marcelo M.S. Lima and Miriam Elizabeth Mendes Angelucci. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hazardous Materials, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.