Philip Winn

4.7k total citations
93 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Philip Winn is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Winn has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 19 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Philip Winn's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (40 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (34 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (21 papers). Philip Winn is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (40 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (34 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (21 papers). Philip Winn collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Philip Winn's co-authors include Wendy L. Inglis, Mary P. Latimer, Charles D. Blaha, Stephen B. Dunnett, Nadine K. Gut, Verity J. Brown, J. Paul Bolam, Juan Mena‐Segovia, Helen L. Alderson and Michael H. Hastings and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Trends in Neurosciences and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Philip Winn

93 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Winn United Kingdom 35 2.3k 1.4k 821 760 570 93 3.5k
Guy Chouvet France 34 3.2k 1.4× 1.9k 1.4× 1.2k 1.5× 699 0.9× 900 1.6× 75 4.7k
O.T. Phillipson United Kingdom 32 2.9k 1.2× 1.5k 1.1× 1.2k 1.4× 565 0.7× 465 0.8× 68 4.1k
Kebreten F. Manaye United States 31 1.6k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 771 0.9× 847 1.1× 360 0.6× 55 3.7k
Sara J. Shammah‐Lagnado Brazil 24 1.3k 0.6× 948 0.7× 439 0.5× 434 0.6× 662 1.2× 27 2.7k
François Georges France 34 2.6k 1.1× 1.1k 0.8× 1.1k 1.3× 381 0.5× 338 0.6× 50 3.6k
John S. Yeomans Canada 35 2.7k 1.2× 2.0k 1.4× 1.2k 1.4× 224 0.3× 422 0.7× 77 4.0k
A. Nieoullon France 32 3.0k 1.3× 1.1k 0.8× 1.3k 1.6× 986 1.3× 242 0.4× 83 4.4k
Heinz Steiner United States 34 3.0k 1.3× 873 0.6× 1.4k 1.7× 624 0.8× 179 0.3× 79 4.0k
Jean‐Jacques Soghomonian United States 33 2.4k 1.1× 748 0.5× 1.0k 1.2× 928 1.2× 193 0.3× 60 3.5k
Kuei Y. Tseng United States 38 3.7k 1.6× 1.5k 1.1× 1.5k 1.8× 527 0.7× 203 0.4× 71 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Winn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Winn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Winn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Winn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Winn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Winn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Winn. The network helps show where Philip Winn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Winn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Winn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Winn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Winn. Philip Winn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Winn, Philip, et al.. (2016). Qualitative Evaluation of a Practice-based Experience Pilot Program for Master of Pharmacy Students in Scotland. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 80(10). 165–165. 11 indexed citations
2.
Gut, Nadine K. & Philip Winn. (2015). Deep Brain Stimulation of Different Pedunculopontine Targets in a Novel Rodent Model of Parkinsonism. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(12). 4792–4803. 62 indexed citations
3.
Boschen, Suelen L., Evellyn Claudia Wietzikoski, Philip Winn, & Cláudio Da Cunha. (2011). The role of nucleus accumbens and dorsolateral striatal D2 receptors in active avoidance conditioning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 96(2). 254–262. 40 indexed citations
4.
Bortolanza, Mariza, Evellyn Claudia Wietzikoski, Suelen L. Boschen, et al.. (2010). Functional disconnection of the substantia nigra pars compacta from the pedunculopontine nucleus impairs learning of a conditioned avoidance task. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 94(2). 229–239. 15 indexed citations
5.
Latimer, Mary P., et al.. (2008). The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the nucleus basalis magnocellularis: Do both have a role in sustained attention?. BMC Neuroscience. 9(1). 16–16. 11 indexed citations
6.
Winn, Philip. (2008). Experimental studies of pedunculopontine functions: Are they motor, sensory or integrative?. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 14. S194–S198. 64 indexed citations
7.
Alderson, Helen L., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2006). Intravenous self‐administration of nicotine is altered by lesions of the posterior, but not anterior, pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. European Journal of Neuroscience. 23(8). 2169–2175. 43 indexed citations
8.
Winn, Philip. (2006). How best to consider the structure and function of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: Evidence from animal studies. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 248(1-2). 234–250. 150 indexed citations
9.
Alderson, Helen L., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (2005). Involvement of the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus in the locomotor response to repeated nicotine administration. Neuroscience Letters. 380(3). 335–339. 22 indexed citations
10.
Ainge, James A., Trisha A. Jenkins, & Philip Winn. (2004). Induction of c‐fos in specific thalamic nuclei following stimulation of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus. European Journal of Neuroscience. 20(7). 1827–1837. 17 indexed citations
11.
12.
Keating, Glenda L. & Philip Winn. (2002). Examination of the role of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in radial maze tasks with or without a delay. Neuroscience. 112(3). 687–696. 49 indexed citations
13.
Winn, Philip. (1998). Frontal syndrome as a consequence of lesions in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: A short theoretical review. Brain Research Bulletin. 47(6). 551–563. 62 indexed citations
14.
Brown, Verity J., Mary P. Latimer, & Philip Winn. (1996). Memory for the changing cost of a reward is mediated by the sublenticular extended amygdala. Brain Research Bulletin. 39(3). 163–170. 11 indexed citations
15.
Weissenborn, Ruth, Charles D. Blaha, Philip Winn, & Anthony G. Phillips. (1996). Schedule-induced polydipsia and the nucleus accumbens: electrochemical measurements of dopamine efflux and effects of excitotoxic lesions in the core. Behavioural Brain Research. 75(1-2). 147–158. 24 indexed citations
16.
Parker, Graham C., Wendy L. Inglis, & Philip Winn. (1993). A comparison of behaviour following stimulation of the anterior substantia nigra by direct cholinergic agonists and anticholinesterases. Psychopharmacology. 112(2-3). 242–248. 6 indexed citations
20.
Hastings, Michael H., Philip Winn, & Stephen B. Dunnett. (1985). Neurotoxic amino acid lesions of the lateral hypothalamus: a parametric comparison of the effects of ibotenate, N-methyl-d,l-aspartate and quisqualate in the rat. Brain Research. 360(1-2). 248–256. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026