Mary M. Lay

482 citations
20 papers · 272 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mary M. Lay

18 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Mary M. Lay
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Literature and Literary Theory 106
  • Gender Studies 59
  • Communication 38
  • Philosophy 49
  • Museology 7
Replace Sianne Ngai with:
Sianne Ngai
Keith Kahn‐Harris United Kingdom
Patricia A. Sullivan United States
Michael J. Hyde United States
Amanda Lagerkvist Sweden
Jenny Edbauer United States
Laura Miller United States
Morag Styles United Kingdom
Kelly McWilliam Australia
Dyan Watson United States
Mary M. Lay relative to Sianne Ngai Sianne Ngai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Sianne Ngai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Lay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Lay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Lay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Lay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Lay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Lay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Lay. The network helps show where Mary M. Lay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mary M. Lay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary M. Lay Line = papers co-authored together Mary M. Lay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20048
2 20038
3
Encompassing gender : integrating international studies and women's studies
200213
4 20022
5 200019
6
The Rhetoric of Midwifery: Gender, Knowledge, and Power
200047
7 19970
8 19966
9
The Emergence of the Feminine Voice, 1526-1640: The Earliest Published Books by English Renaissance Women.
19952
10 19951
11 199430
12 199218
13
Ways Of The World
199215
14 199149
15 198947
16 19881
17
Strategies for technical writing : a rhetoric with readings
19820
18
Teaching Narrative in Technical Writing Classes.
19822
19 19822
20 19802

About Mary M. Lay

Mary M. Lay is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Gender Studies, Philosophy and Cultural Studies, having authored 20 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (1 paper), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (1 paper), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (106 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations), Communication (38 citations), Philosophy (49 citations) and Museology (7 citations). Mary M. Lay has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Tebeaux, Deborah Rosenfelt, Janice Monk, Carol V. Brown, Jack Selzer, Krista Ratcliffe, Laura J. Gurak, Sharon Crowley, Cynthia Myntti and Peter Dear. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Technical Communication, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction and College English.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026