Jack Selzer

716 citations
30 papers · 451 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Selzer

25 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Jack Selzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Literature and Literary Theory 173
  • Philosophy 99
  • Communication 48
  • History and Philosophy of Science 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
Replace Ann Shukman with:
Ann Shukman United Kingdom
Bernadette Longo United States
Nancy Roundy Blyler United States
Cheryl Glenn United States
Charlotte Thralls United States
Dínda L. Gorlée Norway
W. Ross Winterowd United States
Stephen A. Bernhardt United States
Marilyn M. Cooper United States
Rachel Spilka United States
Jack Selzer relative to Ann Shukman United Kingdom Ann Shukman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ann Shukman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Selzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Selzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Selzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Selzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Selzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Selzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Selzer. The network helps show where Jack Selzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Selzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Selzer Line = papers co-authored together Jack Selzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20191
2
The War of Words
20181
3 201216
4
Kenneth Burke and his circles
20086
5 20038
6 20022
7
Good Reasons: Researching and Writing Effective Arguments
20004
8
Kenneth Burke in Greenwich Village
19963
9 19962
10 19951
11
Understanding scientific prose
1993119
12 199046
13 199015
14 19873
15 198522
16 19844
17 198375
18 19821
19 19825
20 19800

About Jack Selzer

Jack Selzer is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Music, General Social Sciences and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (3 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper), Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (173 citations), Philosophy (99 citations), Communication (48 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations). Jack Selzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Doheny‐Farina, Celeste M. Condit, Edward W. Evans, Lester Faigley, Anthony Fung, Frank Newport, Susan Herbst, Matthew Warren, James S. Fishkin and Mary M. Lay. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, College English, Rhetoric Society Quarterly and Nicotine & Tobacco Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026