Mary Lou Jackson
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Epidemiology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert W. MassofPeter J. BexJudith E. GoldsteinJanet D. LatnerJames DeremeikEla B. PlowG. Terence WilsonAlbert J. Stunkard
- Topics
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers)
- Cited by
- OphthalmologyPharmacyNeurology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEOphthalmology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mary Lou Jackson
32 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Ophthalmology 275
- Epidemiology 241
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 150
- Neurology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Lou Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Lou Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Lou Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Lou Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Lou Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Lou Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Lou Jackson. The network helps show where Mary Lou Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Lou Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Lou Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Lou Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Lou Jackson. Mary Lou Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | Binocular Microperimetry with Simulated Asymmetric Bilateral Scotomas | 3 |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | The Reliability of the quick CSF Method for Contrast Sensitivity Assessment in Low Vision | 6 |
| 12 | Clinical Application Of A Novel Contrast Sensitivity Test To A Low Vision Population: The Quick CSF Method | 7 |
| 13 | Visual Search with Image Enhancements in Age-Related Macular Degeneration | 1 |
| 14 | 77 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Mary Lou Jackson
Mary Lou Jackson is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Family Practice and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 32 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (13 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (10 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (275 citations), Pharmacy (54 citations) and Neurology (74 citations). Mary Lou Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert W. Massof, Peter J. Bex, Judith E. Goldstein, Janet D. Latner, James Deremeik, Ela B. Plow, G. Terence Wilson, Albert J. Stunkard, Lotfi B. Merabet and Jonathan L. Ferencz. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.