Donald F. Everett

4.2k total citations
11 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Donald F. Everett is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Donald F. Everett has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 5 papers in Ophthalmology and 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Donald F. Everett's work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). Donald F. Everett is often cited by papers focused on Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (4 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). Donald F. Everett collaborates with scholars based in United States. Donald F. Everett's co-authors include Leslie Hyman, Wendy Marsh‐Tootle, Ruth E. Manny, Thomas T. Norton, Mitchell Scheiman, Timothy B. Edrington, Joseph T. Barr, Karla Zadnik, Mae O. Gordon and M. Cristina Leske and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Donald F. Everett

10 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Donald F. Everett
Noel C. Wheeler United States
Deanna J. Taylor United Kingdom
Mary Lawrence United States
Rosario Sánchez United States
Moon Jeong Lee United States
Mark W. Swanson United States
Lama Assi United States
Donald F. Everett
Citations per year, relative to Donald F. Everett Donald F. Everett (= 1×) peers Olavi Pärssinen

Countries citing papers authored by Donald F. Everett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald F. Everett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald F. Everett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald F. Everett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald F. Everett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald F. Everett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald F. Everett. The network helps show where Donald F. Everett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald F. Everett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald F. Everett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald F. Everett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald F. Everett. Donald F. Everett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Cotter, Susan A., Allison R. Edwards, Robert W. Arnold, et al.. (2007). Treatment of Strabismic Amblyopia With Refractive Correction. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 143(6). 1060–1063. 59 indexed citations
2.
Repka, Michael X., Susan A. Cotter, Roy W. Beck, et al.. (2004). A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology. 111(11). 2076–2085.e4. 168 indexed citations
3.
Holmes, Jonathan M., Roy W. Beck, Raymond T. Kraker, et al.. (2004). Patching regimens: author reply. Ophthalmology. 111(5). 1064–1066.
4.
Gwiazda, Jane E., Leslie Hyman, Thomas T. Norton, et al.. (2004). Accommodation and Related Risk Factors Associated with Myopia Progression and Their Interaction with Treatment in COMET Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(7). 2143–2143. 226 indexed citations
5.
Holmes, Jonathan M., Roy W. Beck, Raymond T. Kraker, et al.. (2004). Risk of amblyopia recurrence after cessation of treatment.. PubMed. 8(5). 420–8. 114 indexed citations
6.
Gwiazda, Jane, Leslie Hyman, Mohamed Toufic El Hussein, et al.. (2003). A Randomized Clinical Trial of Progressive Addition Lenses versus Single Vision Lenses on the Progression of Myopia in Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(4). 1492–1492. 463 indexed citations
7.
Barr, Joseph T., Karla Zadnik, Brad S. Wilson, et al.. (2000). Factors Associated with Corneal Scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Cornea. 19(4). 501–507. 51 indexed citations
8.
Zadnik, Karla, Joseph T. Barr, Timothy B. Edrington, et al.. (1998). Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study.. PubMed. 39(13). 2537–46. 447 indexed citations
9.
Wisniewski, Stephen R., Mark E. Hammer, W. Sanderson Grizzard, et al.. (1997). An Investigation of the Hospital Charges Related to the Treatment of Endophthalmitis in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Ophthalmology. 104(5). 739–745. 16 indexed citations
10.
Cornoni‐Huntley, Joan, Tamara B. Harris, Donald F. Everett, et al.. (1991). An overview of body weight of older persons, including the impact on mortality The national health and nutrition examination survey i-epidemiologic follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 44(8). 743–753. 239 indexed citations
11.
Murphy, Suzanne P., Donald F. Everett, & Connie Dresser. (1989). Food group consumption reported by the elderly during the NHANES I epidemiologic followup study. Journal of Nutrition Education. 21(5). 214–220. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026