Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials
20022.0k citationsHelena C. Kraemer, G. Terence Wilson et al.Archives of General Psychiatryprofile →
Long-term maintenance of weight loss: Current status.
2000873 citationsG. Terence Wilson, Albert J. Stunkard et al.profile →
Understanding and preventing relapse.
1986722 citationsKelly D. Brownell, G. Terence Wilson et al.profile →
Gender difference in the prevalence of eating disorder symptoms
2008492 citationsG. Terence Wilson, Helena C. Kraemer et al.International Journal of Eating Disordersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by G. Terence Wilson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Terence Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Terence Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Terence Wilson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Terence Wilson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Terence Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Terence Wilson. The network helps show where G. Terence Wilson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Terence Wilson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Terence Wilson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Terence Wilson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Terence Wilson. G. Terence Wilson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jewitt, Carey, Victoria Mitchell, G. Terence Wilson, et al.. (2022). Supporting novice designers design of digital touch. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 33(1). 191–216.1 indexed citations
Kraemer, Helena C., G. Terence Wilson, Christopher G. Fairburn, & W. Stewart Agras. (2002). Mediators and Moderators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials. Archives of General Psychiatry. 59(10). 877–877.2023 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Grilo, Carlos M., Robin M. Masheb, & G. Terence Wilson. (2001). Subtyping binge eating disorder.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 69(6). 1066–1072.146 indexed citations
Blackburn, George L., G. Terence Wilson, Beatrice S. Kanders, et al.. (1989). Weight cycling: the experience of human dieters. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 49(5). 1105–1109.122 indexed citations
17.
Wilson, G. Terence. (1987). Review of behavior therapy : theory and practice. Guilford Press eBooks.17 indexed citations
18.
Wilson, G. Terence & Cyril M. Franks. (1982). Contemporary behavior therapy : conceptual and empirical foundations. Guilford Press eBooks.24 indexed citations
Franks, Cyril M., G. Terence Wilson, Philip C. Kendall, & Kelly D. Brownell. (1973). Annual review of behavior therapy : theory & practice.72 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.