Emma Young

1.1k total citations
20 papers, 759 citations indexed

About

Emma Young is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Young has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 759 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 5 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 5 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Emma Young's work include Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). Emma Young is often cited by papers focused on Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). Emma Young collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Emma Young's co-authors include John A. Smith, Chris Hollis, Madeleine J. Groom, Althea Valentine, Charlotte L Hall, Beverley J Brown, Joshua A. Young, Nitish Mehta, Sarwar Zahid and Shireen Patel and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Hepatology and Clinical Psychology Review.

In The Last Decade

Emma Young

20 papers receiving 738 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Young United Kingdom 11 306 287 122 102 96 20 759
Ali Salimi Canada 19 269 0.9× 300 1.0× 44 0.4× 59 0.6× 8 0.1× 61 992
Caroline Murphy United Kingdom 19 179 0.6× 144 0.5× 20 0.2× 87 0.9× 14 0.1× 56 963
Yifan Xiang China 13 106 0.3× 138 0.5× 32 0.3× 83 0.8× 12 0.1× 37 839
Sohela Hassan United States 9 243 0.8× 259 0.9× 43 0.4× 24 0.2× 18 0.2× 12 862
Julia S. Benoit United States 14 130 0.4× 143 0.5× 69 0.6× 36 0.4× 4 0.0× 44 793
X. Zhong China 9 142 0.5× 72 0.3× 14 0.1× 30 0.3× 22 0.2× 15 571
David Abrams United States 11 69 0.2× 77 0.3× 24 0.2× 42 0.4× 26 0.3× 29 509
Jana Pöttgen Germany 18 34 0.1× 64 0.2× 28 0.2× 27 0.3× 69 0.7× 45 1.1k
Steven Hay United States 9 242 0.8× 101 0.4× 32 0.3× 11 0.1× 11 0.1× 18 438
Elizabeth Pulos United States 12 35 0.1× 20 0.1× 128 1.0× 76 0.7× 16 0.2× 20 612

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Young. The network helps show where Emma Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Young. Emma Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Patel, Shireen, Athfah Akhtar, Sam Malins, et al.. (2020). The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(7). e16228–e16228. 111 indexed citations
2.
Valentine, Althea, Sophie Hall, Emma Young, et al.. (2020). Implementation of Telehealth Services to Assess, Monitor, and Treat Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(1). e22619–e22619. 64 indexed citations
3.
Valentine, Althea, Beverley J Brown, Madeleine J. Groom, et al.. (2020). A systematic review evaluating the implementation of technologies to assess, monitor and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: A map of the current evidence. Clinical Psychology Review. 80. 101870–101870. 75 indexed citations
4.
5.
Tsui, Edmund, Sarwar Zahid, Nitish Mehta, et al.. (2017). Fractal Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy With and Without Macular Edema. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 3779–3779. 1 indexed citations
6.
Tsui, Edmund, Sarwar Zahid, Emma Young, et al.. (2017). VALUE OF FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY. Retina. 38(9). 1816–1823. 54 indexed citations
7.
Crocker, Stephen J., et al.. (2017). (113) TIMP-1 regulates the persistence of inflammatory hypersensitivity. Journal of Pain. 18(4). S5–S5. 1 indexed citations
8.
Zahid, Sarwar, Rosa Dolz‐Marco, K. Bailey Freund, et al.. (2016). Fractal Dimensional Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Eyes With Diabetic Retinopathy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(11). 4940–4940. 153 indexed citations
9.
Young, Emma. (2015). The importance of research in healthcare. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(4). 90–91. 3 indexed citations
10.
Young, Emma & John A. Smith. (2011). Pharmacologic therapy for cough. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. 11(3). 224–230. 14 indexed citations
11.
Young, Emma, Lesley A. Houghton, Kimberley Holt, Ashley Woodcock, & John A. Smith. (2011). S144a Endogenous inhibition of experimentally induced cough in healthy subjects. Thorax. 66(Suppl 4). A66–A66. 2 indexed citations
12.
Young, Emma, Helen L. Sumner, Angela Kelsall, Ashley Woodcock, & John A. Smith. (2010). S115 Magnitude of cough response to inhaled capsaicin differentiates between health and disease. Thorax. 65(Suppl 4). A53–A53. 2 indexed citations
13.
Young, Emma, Helen L. Sumner, Samantha Decalmer, et al.. (2010). Does Central Up-regulation Of The N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Contribute To Cough Reflex Hypersensitivity?. A5906–A5906. 5 indexed citations
14.
Young, Emma & John A. Smith. (2010). Quality of life in patients with chronic cough. Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease. 4(1). 49–55. 74 indexed citations
15.
Young, Emma, Catherine Johnson, Rachel Calam, et al.. (2009). The effect of mindfulness meditation on cough reflex sensitivity. Thorax. 64(11). 993–998. 32 indexed citations
16.
Jeffrey, Gary P., et al.. (2006). Hepatitis C virus eradication in intravenous drug users maintained with subcutaneous naltrexone implants. Hepatology. 45(1). 111–117. 46 indexed citations
17.
Jack, Barbara, et al.. (2006). An action research project to modernise the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Specialist Palliative Care Services in the United Kingdom. Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University). 1 indexed citations
18.
Young, Emma. (2006). Laws fail to stop India's organ trade.. PubMed. 188(2522). 20–20. 1 indexed citations
19.
Young, Emma, et al.. (2005). Transition to practice: a pilot PGY-4 private practice clinical simulation designed to refine and assess ACGME core competencies. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. 17(8). 676–676. 2 indexed citations
20.
Taylor, Robert M., et al.. (1990). Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study.. BMJ. 301(6763). 1243–1247. 96 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026