Mary Chambers

2.6k citations
69 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 22

Mary Chambers

68 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mary Chambers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Research and Theory 75
  • Clinical Psychology 744
  • General Health Professions 768
  • Social Psychology 534
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
Replace Ann M. Mitchell with:
Ann M. Mitchell United States
Eileen Clark Australia
Niels Buus Denmark
Gail W. Stuart United States
Shaher H. Hamaideh Jordan
Bridget Hamilton Australia
Judith A. Vessey United States
Ben Hannigan United Kingdom
Joanne Fitzpatrick United Kingdom
Cynthia S. Jacelon United States
Mary Chambers relative to Ann M. Mitchell United States Ann M. Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ann M. Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Chambers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Chambers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Chambers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Chambers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Chambers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Chambers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Chambers. The network helps show where Mary Chambers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Chambers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Chambers Line = papers co-authored together Mary Chambers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20248
3 20215
4 201910
5
Service user involvement in the coproduction of a mental \nhealth nursing metric : The Therapeutic Engagement \nQuestionnaire
201721
6
Saudi Arabian Teachers' Knowledge and Beliefs about ADHD.
20149
7 201449
8 20144
9 201029
10 201087
11 2009131
12 20062
13 200256
14 200188
15 200015
16 19999
17 19941
18
Home infusion partners with managed care.
19931
19 199010
20 198813

About Mary Chambers

Mary Chambers is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (14 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (14 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (75 citations), Clinical Psychology (744 citations), General Health Professions (768 citations), Social Psychology (534 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations). Mary Chambers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maritta Välimäki, Veslemøy Guise, Stuart Logan, Katrina Williams, Steve Gillard, Kati Turner, Rohan Borschmann, Assumpta Ryan, Annette Boaz and Alison O’Shea. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Health Expectations, Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Nursing Studies and International Journal of Mental Health Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026