Joanne Fitzpatrick

2.0k citations
62 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Joanne Fitzpatrick

58 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Joanne Fitzpatrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Research and Theory 143
  • Leadership and Management 51
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 45
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 50
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 98
Replace Julia Roberts with:
Julia Roberts United Kingdom
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan
Kerry Reid‐Searl Australia
Lynn Chenoweth Australia
Lily Dongxia Xiao Australia
Ingegerd Fagerberg Sweden
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi Iran
Kathleen Krichbaum United States
Jane Stein‐Parbury Australia
Jeanne M. Sorrell United States
Joanne Fitzpatrick relative to Julia Roberts United Kingdom Julia Roberts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Julia Roberts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Fitzpatrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Fitzpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Fitzpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Fitzpatrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Fitzpatrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Fitzpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Fitzpatrick. The network helps show where Joanne Fitzpatrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanne Fitzpatrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joanne Fitzpatrick Line = papers co-authored together Joanne Fitzpatrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20242
4 20235
5 202314
6 202224
7 202214
8 202112
9 201851
10 201724
11 20055
12 200544
13 200384
14 200331
15 199975
16 199614
17 19967
18 19941
19 199235
20 19876

About Joanne Fitzpatrick

Joanne Fitzpatrick is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Family Practice, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (24 papers), Nursing education and management (11 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (5 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (143 citations), Leadership and Management (51 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (45 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (50 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (98 citations). Joanne Fitzpatrick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Julia Roberts, Alison While, K. Louise Barriball, Jitna Por, David Cowan, John S. Werry, Vasiliki Tzouvara, Freda Mold, Anne Marie Rafferty and Ruth Harris. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today, BMJ Open and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026