Mary Beth Kadlec
About
In The Last Decade
Mary Beth Kadlec
7 papers receiving 918 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 853
- Clinical Psychology 384
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 358
- Psychiatry and Mental health 269
- Genetics 231
Countries citing papers authored by Mary Beth Kadlec
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Beth Kadlec's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Beth Kadlec with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Beth Kadlec more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Beth Kadlec
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Beth Kadlec. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Beth Kadlec. The network helps show where Mary Beth Kadlec may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Beth Kadlec
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Beth Kadlec. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Beth Kadlec based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Beth Kadlec. Mary Beth Kadlec is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 331 | |
| 3 | 194 | |
| 4 | 193 | |
| 5 | 214 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 21 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.