Mary A. Pyc

2.1k total citations
21 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Mary A. Pyc is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary A. Pyc has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mary A. Pyc's work include Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (8 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers). Mary A. Pyc is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (19 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (8 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (7 papers). Mary A. Pyc collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mary A. Pyc's co-authors include Katherine A. Rawson, Henry L. Roediger, Kathryn T. Wissman, John Dunlosky, Angela C. Jones, Heather Bailey, Phillip J. Grimaldi, Kalif E. Vaughn, Aubrey M. Schonhoff and Geoffrey B. Maddox and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Developmental Psychology and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Mary A. Pyc

21 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary A. Pyc United States 15 970 693 556 404 259 21 1.5k
Johanna K. Kaakinen Finland 21 459 0.5× 777 1.1× 282 0.5× 684 1.7× 191 0.7× 65 1.6k
Jonathan G. Tullis United States 16 536 0.6× 407 0.6× 233 0.4× 260 0.6× 218 0.8× 31 1.0k
Tracy Linderholm United States 18 383 0.4× 965 1.4× 251 0.5× 352 0.9× 341 1.3× 32 1.4k
Janell R. Blunt United States 12 546 0.6× 618 0.9× 232 0.4× 311 0.8× 339 1.3× 14 1.2k
Christopher A. Rowland United States 6 514 0.5× 424 0.6× 246 0.4× 247 0.6× 187 0.7× 8 848
Steven C. Pan United States 16 478 0.5× 385 0.6× 207 0.4× 234 0.6× 225 0.9× 44 839
Lynda K. Hall United States 15 634 0.7× 873 1.3× 148 0.3× 282 0.7× 323 1.2× 21 1.3k
Raymond Bertram Finland 28 1.6k 1.7× 2.0k 2.8× 634 1.1× 570 1.4× 160 0.6× 53 2.5k
Yana Weinstein United States 19 581 0.6× 263 0.4× 124 0.2× 310 0.8× 236 0.9× 34 1.2k
Veronica X. Yan United States 16 279 0.3× 401 0.6× 152 0.3× 378 0.9× 187 0.7× 47 897

Countries citing papers authored by Mary A. Pyc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary A. Pyc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary A. Pyc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary A. Pyc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary A. Pyc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary A. Pyc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary A. Pyc. The network helps show where Mary A. Pyc may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary A. Pyc

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary A. Pyc. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary A. Pyc based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary A. Pyc. Mary A. Pyc is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pyc, Mary A., et al.. (2024). Production and Preschoolers: Is There a Benefit and Do They Know?. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie). 71(5). 247–258. 1 indexed citations
2.
Maddox, Geoffrey B., et al.. (2018). Examining the contributions of desirable difficulty and reminding to the spacing effect. Memory & Cognition. 46(8). 1376–1388. 8 indexed citations
4.
Morehead, Kayla, John Dunlosky, Katherine A. Rawson, Melissa Bishop, & Mary A. Pyc. (2017). Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis. Memory. 26(4). 535–546. 2 indexed citations
5.
Pyc, Mary A., Katherine A. Rawson, & Andrew J. Aschenbrenner. (2014). Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: When and why are judgments accurate?. Memory & Cognition. 42(6). 886–897. 7 indexed citations
6.
Pyc, Mary A., David A. Balota, Kathleen B. McDermott, Tim Tully, & Henry L. Roediger. (2014). Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval. Memory & Cognition. 42(6). 965–977. 7 indexed citations
7.
Jones, Angela C. & Mary A. Pyc. (2013). The production effect: Costs and benefits in free recall.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 40(1). 300–305. 33 indexed citations
8.
Pyc, Mary A., et al.. (2013). Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.. Developmental Psychology. 50(4). 994–1000. 42 indexed citations
9.
Vaughn, Kalif E., Katherine A. Rawson, & Mary A. Pyc. (2013). Repeated retrieval practice and item difficulty: Does criterion learning eliminate item difficulty effects?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 20(6). 1239–1245. 25 indexed citations
10.
Wissman, Kathryn T., Katherine A. Rawson, & Mary A. Pyc. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards?. Memory. 20(6). 568–579. 109 indexed citations
11.
Pyc, Mary A. & Katherine A. Rawson. (2012). Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?. Memory & Cognition. 40(6). 976–988. 14 indexed citations
12.
Roediger, Henry L. & Mary A. Pyc. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 1(4). 242–248. 199 indexed citations
13.
Roediger, Henry L. & Mary A. Pyc. (2012). Applying cognitive psychology to education: Complexities and prospects.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 1(4). 263–265. 6 indexed citations
14.
Pyc, Mary A. & Katherine A. Rawson. (2011). Why is test–restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(3). 737–746. 84 indexed citations
15.
Wissman, Kathryn T., Katherine A. Rawson, & Mary A. Pyc. (2011). The interim test effect: Testing prior material can facilitate the learning of new material. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 18(6). 1140–1147. 95 indexed citations
16.
Grimaldi, Phillip J., Mary A. Pyc, & Katherine A. Rawson. (2010). Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian—English paired associates. Behavior Research Methods. 42(3). 634–642. 30 indexed citations
17.
Pyc, Mary A. & John Dunlosky. (2010). Toward an understanding of students’ allocation of study time: Why do they decide to mass or space their practice?. Memory & Cognition. 38(4). 431–440. 38 indexed citations
18.
Pyc, Mary A. & Katherine A. Rawson. (2009). Costs and benefits of dropout schedules of test–restudy practice: Implications for student learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25(1). 87–95. 30 indexed citations
19.
Pyc, Mary A. & Katherine A. Rawson. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory?. Journal of Memory and Language. 60(4). 437–447. 366 indexed citations
20.
Pyc, Mary A. & Katherine A. Rawson. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition. 35(8). 1917–1927. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026