Martina Schaefer

14 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Martina Schaefer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pharmaceutical Science 39
  • Reproductive Medicine 48
  • Physiology 25
  • Genetics 51
  • Physiology 95
Replace Nathalie Schmid with:
Nathalie Schmid United States
Itsuo Murakami Japan
Manjul K. Agarwal France
W. Eechaute Belgium
Ernest Bloom United States
Cyrus P. Barnum United States
Senmaw Fang United States
SABURO YAMAZOE Japan
W.H. Pearlman United States
O Crépy France
Martina Schaefer relative to Nathalie Schmid United States Nathalie Schmid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Nathalie Schmid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Martina Schaefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martina Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martina Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martina Schaefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martina Schaefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martina Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martina Schaefer. The network helps show where Martina Schaefer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Martina Schaefer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Martina Schaefer Line = papers co-authored together Martina Schaefer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201091
2 200685
3 201355
4 201948
5 199946
6 200723
7 199919
8 202019
9 202317
10 199811
11 20074
12 20211
13 19961
14
Evaluation of a new pharmacologic strategy for Nrf2 activation for retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury
20181
15 20030
16 20240

About Martina Schaefer

Martina Schaefer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Organic Chemistry, Physiology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers), Vitamin K Research Studies (2 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (2 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (1 paper), Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (1 paper), Sperm and Testicular Function (1 paper) and Dermatology and Skin Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (39 citations), Reproductive Medicine (48 citations), Physiology (25 citations), Genetics (51 citations) and Physiology (95 citations). Martina Schaefer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Focco van den Akker, Johannes-Peter Stasch, John C. Herr, Gerhard Haidl, Younghwan Kim, Ursula Egner, Arabinda Mandal, Pete Dunten, Annie Beuve and Padmamalini Baskaran. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Tetrahedron Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact