Marsha Speck
About
In The Last Decade
Marsha Speck
7 papers receiving 171 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Education 181
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 32
- Information Systems and Management 21
- Information Systems 19
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19
Countries citing papers authored by Marsha Speck
This map shows the geographic impact of Marsha Speck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marsha Speck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marsha Speck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marsha Speck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marsha Speck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marsha Speck. The network helps show where Marsha Speck may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why Can't We Get It Right?: Designing High-Quality Professional Development for Standards-Based Schools | 55 |
| 2 | Why Can't We Get It Right? Designing High-Quality Professional Development for Standards-Based Schools. Second Edition. | 0 |
| 3 | The principal as professional development leader | 34 |
| 4 | Why Can′t We Get It Right?: Professional Development in Our Schools | 41 |
| 5 | The Principalship: Building a Learning Community | 40 |
| 6 | The Change Process in a School Learning Community. | 5 |
| 7 | Developing Effective Peer Coaching Experiences for School Administrators. | 1 |
| 8 | Best Practice in Professional Development for Sustained Educational Change. | 70 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.