Marleen S. Barr
- Philosophy top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- Nicholas D. SmithJames E. GunnRichard FeldsteinAnn ThompsonHelen WilcoxTom ShippeyGeorge SlusserW. Warren Wagar
- Topics
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (10 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers)Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Marleen S. Barr
20 papers receiving 78 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Philosophy 59
- Literature and Literary Theory 55
- Sociology and Political Science 47
- Cultural Studies 41
- Gender Studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by Marleen S. Barr
This map shows the geographic impact of Marleen S. Barr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marleen S. Barr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marleen S. Barr more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marleen S. Barr
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marleen S. Barr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marleen S. Barr. The network helps show where Marleen S. Barr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marleen S. Barr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marleen S. Barr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marleen S. Barr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marleen S. Barr. Marleen S. Barr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Science Fiction Language/political Reporting: Communicating News Via Words from Nowhere Real | 0 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Future Females, The Next Generation: New Voices and Velocities in Feminist Science Fiction | 6 |
| 8 | Genre Fission: A New Discourse Practice for Culture Studies | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Alien to Femininity: Speculative Fiction and Feminist Theory | 17 |
| 19 | Women and utopia: Critical interpretations | 10 |
| 20 | Future females : a critical anthology | 20 |
About Marleen S. Barr
Marleen S. Barr is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Classics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 147 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (10 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (59 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations) and Cultural Studies (41 citations). Marleen S. Barr has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas D. Smith, James E. Gunn, Richard Feldstein, Ann Thompson, Helen Wilcox, Tom Shippey, George Slusser and W. Warren Wagar. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Women s Studies International Forum and African Studies Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.