Mark T. Gilderhus
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Demography
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth J. GriébStephen J. RandallLorenzo MeyerFredrick B. PikeKarl M. SchmittLinda B. HallRoderic Ai CampRobert N. Seidel
- Topics
- Latin American and Latino Studies (9 papers)Politics and Society in Latin America (5 papers)Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (5 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of American HistoryHispanic American Historical Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark T. Gilderhus
37 papers receiving 131 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Political Science and International Relations 96
- Sociology and Political Science 78
- History 23
- Demography 21
- Cultural Studies 17
Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Gilderhus
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Gilderhus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Gilderhus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Gilderhus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Gilderhus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Gilderhus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Gilderhus. The network helps show where Mark T. Gilderhus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark T. Gilderhus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark T. Gilderhus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark T. Gilderhus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark T. Gilderhus. Mark T. Gilderhus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | History and Historians | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | The second century | 2 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Mark T. Gilderhus
Mark T. Gilderhus is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 49 papers that have together received 194 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American and Latino Studies (9 papers), Politics and Society in Latin America (5 papers) and Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (96 citations), Development (12 citations) and History (23 citations). Mark T. Gilderhus has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth J. Griéb, Stephen J. Randall, Lorenzo Meyer, Fredrick B. Pike, Karl M. Schmitt, Linda B. Hall, Roderic Ai Camp and Robert N. Seidel. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Hispanic American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.