Robert Freeman Smith
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- History top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Richard H. ImmermanMiguel S. WionczekPhilip S. FonerDudley SeersLinda B. HallRamón Eduardo RuízKenneth J. GriébCharles D. Ameringer
- Topics
- Cuban History and Society (21 papers)Latin American and Latino Studies (8 papers)Politics and Society in Latin America (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Cultural StudiesPolitical Science and International RelationsSociology and Political Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Robert Freeman Smith
41 papers receiving 159 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Sociology and Political Science 125
- Political Science and International Relations 92
- Cultural Studies 45
- History 17
- Economics and Econometrics 16
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Freeman Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Freeman Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Freeman Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Freeman Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Freeman Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Freeman Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Freeman Smith. The network helps show where Robert Freeman Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Freeman Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Freeman Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Freeman Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Freeman Smith. Robert Freeman Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 76 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Estados Unidos y las reformas de la Revolución Mexicana, 1915-1928 | 1 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | The United States and Cuba | 1 |
About Robert Freeman Smith
Robert Freeman Smith is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 53 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cuban History and Society (21 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (8 papers) and Politics and Society in Latin America (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (45 citations), Political Science and International Relations (92 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (125 citations). Robert Freeman Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard H. Immerman, Miguel S. Wionczek, Philip S. Foner, Dudley Seers, Linda B. Hall, Ramón Eduardo Ruíz, Kenneth J. Griéb, Charles D. Ameringer, David Healy and Hans Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.