Mark Sprevak

1.2k citations
26 papers · 483 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Sprevak

25 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Mark Sprevak
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • History and Philosophy of Science 151
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 311
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Philosophy 90
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 80
Replace Frances Egan with:
Frances Egan United States
Marcin Miłkowski Poland
Michael Rescorla United States
Lawrence A. Shapiro United States
Cory Wright United States
Thomas W. Polger United States
Charles Wallis United States
Diana Raffman United States
Julia Tanney United Kingdom
S. Orestis Palermos United Kingdom
Mark Sprevak relative to Frances Egan United States Frances Egan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Frances Egan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sprevak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sprevak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sprevak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sprevak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sprevak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sprevak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sprevak. The network helps show where Mark Sprevak may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Sprevak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Sprevak Line = papers co-authored together Mark Sprevak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20234
2 202317
3 20221
4 20202
5 201914
6 20188
7 201853
8
Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism
201737
9 201712
10 20161
11 201427
12 201343
13 20103
14 201038
15 201064
16 200996
17
Functionalism and extended cognition.
20073
18 20061
19
The Frame Problem and the Treatment of Prediction
20050
20
Computing, Philosophy and Cognition
200512

About Mark Sprevak

Mark Sprevak is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Embodied and Extended Cognition (10 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (1 paper) and Language and cultural evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (151 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (311 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Philosophy (90 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (80 citations). Mark Sprevak has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Matteo Colombo, Jesper Kallestrup, Ryan Smith, Jonathan P. Bowen, Robin Wilson, Douglas Cairns, Jack Copeland and Peter J. Garratt. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Synthese, Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology and Philosophical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026