Matteo Colombo
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Cory WrightStephan HartmannPeggy SerièsMark SprevakJan SprengerGualtiero PiccininiMark J. BrandtJan G. Voelkel
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (17 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)Embodied and Extended Cognition (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Matteo Colombo
62 papers receiving 739 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Cognitive Neuroscience 475
- History and Philosophy of Science 161
- Social Psychology 121
- Sociology and Political Science 96
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Matteo Colombo
This map shows the geographic impact of Matteo Colombo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matteo Colombo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matteo Colombo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matteo Colombo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matteo Colombo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matteo Colombo. The network helps show where Matteo Colombo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matteo Colombo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matteo Colombo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matteo Colombo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matteo Colombo. Matteo Colombo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | Determinants of judgments of explanatory power: Credibility, Generalizability, and Causal Framing | 1 |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | Why Build a Virtual Brain? Large-scale Neural Simulations as Test-bed for Artificial Computing Systems | 2 |
| 14 | Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense, and Value-Free Science : An Empirical Study | 1 |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | Ricostruzione al computer dei colori di alimenti da letture con colorimetro | 1 |
About Matteo Colombo
Matteo Colombo is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 66 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (17 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers) and Embodied and Extended Cognition (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (161 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (475 citations) and General Decision Sciences (41 citations). Matteo Colombo has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cory Wright, Stephan Hartmann, Peggy Seriès, Mark Sprevak, Jan Sprenger, Gualtiero Piccinini, Mark J. Brandt, Jan G. Voelkel, Yoel Inbar and Markus Knauff. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Cognitive Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.