Thomas W. Polger
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Lawrence A. ShapiroOwen FlanaganDale PurvesBeau LottoKenneth J. SufkaMichael A. RileyScott A. HuettelJan Pieter Konsman
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers)
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCognitive Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas W. Polger
26 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
- History and Philosophy of Science 188
- Cognitive Neuroscience 181
- Philosophy 99
- Social Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Polger
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Polger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Polger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Polger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Polger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Polger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Polger. The network helps show where Thomas W. Polger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Polger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Polger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Polger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Polger. Thomas W. Polger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 83 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Explaining the evolution of consciousness: The other hard problem | 1 |
| 20 | 19 |
About Thomas W. Polger
Thomas W. Polger is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (188 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations). Thomas W. Polger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence A. Shapiro, Owen Flanagan, Dale Purves, Beau Lotto, Kenneth J. Sufka, Michael A. Riley, Scott A. Huettel and Jan Pieter Konsman. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.