Mark S. Foster

27 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Mark S. Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Sociology and Political Science 79
  • General Health Professions 74
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 48
  • Economics and Econometrics 42
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 40
Replace Michael De Looper with:
Michael De Looper Australia
Catherine Kelly United Kingdom
Surinder M. Bhardwaj United States
Caroline Wong Australia
D. Mark Austin United States
Tony Gatrell United Kingdom
Tholang Mokhele South Africa
Andrew Waa New Zealand
Giuseppe Deledda Italy
Inga T. Winkler United States
Mark S. Foster relative to Michael De Looper Australia Michael De Looper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael De Looper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Foster. The network helps show where Mark S. Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Foster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Foster. Mark S. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES WORKSHOP ON PLASMA MATERIALS INTERACTIONS: Report on Science Challenges and Research Opportunities in Plasma Materials Interactions
2
2
Response rates in GP surveys - trialling two recruitment strategies.
146
3
Renewable Power in Rural Alaska: Improved Opportunities for Economic Deployment
1
4 4
5
A nation on wheels : the automobile culture in America since 1945
15
6 0
7 1
8
Adaptations of Shakespeare : a critical anthology of plays from the seventeenth century to the present
33
9
An Exploration of the NASCAR Fanage
0
10 3
11 3
12 13
13 3
14 8
15 0
16 6
17 22
18 11
19 1
20 0

About Mark S. Foster

Mark S. Foster is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing and History, having authored 40 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (11 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (32 citations), Urban Studies (25 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations). Mark S. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Parker Magin, Graeme Horton, Billie Bonevski, Afaf Girgis, Daniel Fischlin, Glen E. Holt, Mark Rose, Carl H. Smith, William H. Goetzmann and William Issel. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Technology and Culture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026