Thomas Fuller

777 citations
16 papers · 476 indexed · h-index 8
Topics
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers)Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

Thomas Fuller

16 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

Thomas Fuller
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Sensory Systems 338
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 301
  • Neurology 202
  • Speech and Hearing 45
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 39
Replace Chryssoula Thodi with:
Chryssoula Thodi Cyprus
Marc A. Fagelson United States
David S. Chen United States
Nandini Govil United States
Caroline Giulioli France
Siti Zamratol‐Mai Sarah Mukari Malaysia
Jeremy Applebaum United States
Sara K. Mamo United States
Chris Allan Canada
Jean-François Dartigues France
Thomas Fuller relative to Chryssoula Thodi Cyprus Chryssoula Thodi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Chryssoula Thodi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Fuller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Fuller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Fuller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Fuller. The network helps show where Thomas Fuller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Fuller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Fuller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Fuller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Fuller. Thomas Fuller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 4
3 5
4 139
5 7
6 86
7 7
8 122
9 1
10
Tailor made for health psychology: issues in the design and effectiveness of internet interventions
4
11 30
12 23
13
Transparent Reporting, the Foundation for Full Disclosure
2
14 20
15
Review of Internet-based Psychological Services and Products
1
16 23

About Thomas Fuller

Thomas Fuller is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (338 citations), Neurology (202 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (301 citations). Thomas Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Rilana Cima, Birgit Mazurek, Derek J. Hoare, Johan W.S. Vlaeyen, Berthold Langguth, Mark Pearson, Rob Anderson, Haúla F. Haider, Arnaud Noreña and Sarah Rabau. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Public Health and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026