Mark M. Rich
-
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders 13
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 23
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 21
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases 18
- Neurology top 1%
- Genetics top 1%
- Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research 14
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 57
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 17
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 14
Mark M. Rich
107 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 1.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
- Neurology 1.2k
- Genetics 784
- Developmental Neuroscience 240
Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Rich
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Rich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Rich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Rich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Rich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Rich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Rich. The network helps show where Mark M. Rich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark M. Rich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 151 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 9 | An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline: The Diagnosis of Intensive Care Unit–acquired Weakness in Adultsbreakdown → | 2014 | 323 |
| 10 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 319 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 47 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 36 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 12 |
About Mark M. Rich
Mark M. Rich is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Neurology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (57 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (23 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (21 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (18 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (17 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (14 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (14 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (1.3k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.6k citations) and Neurology (1.2k citations). Mark M. Rich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Martin J. Pinter, Xueyong Wang, James W. Teener, Shawn J. Bird, Susan D. Kraner, Jeff W. Lichtman, Eric C. Raps, Jaffar Khan, Peter Wenner and Marc Moss. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Annals of Neurology, Journal of Neurophysiology, Neurology and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.