Mark Lance

1.2k citations
35 papers · 402 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Lance

34 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Mark Lance
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Philosophy 238
  • History and Philosophy of Science 56
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 103
  • Language and Linguistics 54
Replace Michael Blome‐Tillmann with:
Michael Blome‐Tillmann United Kingdom
John Koethe United States
John Biro United States
Timothy Sundell United States
Kathrin Glüer Sweden
Matthew A. Benton United States
Åsa Wikforss Sweden
Anandi Hattiangadi Sweden
Gunnar Björnsson Sweden
Carrie Jenkins United Kingdom
Mark Lance relative to Michael Blome‐Tillmann United Kingdom Michael Blome‐Tillmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Blome‐Tillmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lance. The network helps show where Mark Lance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Lance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Lance Line = papers co-authored together Mark Lance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201342
2 199741
3 200429
4 199523
5 199818
6 201018
7 199115
8 200914
9 202014
10 199614
11 201413
12 199413
13 199712
14 200712
15 200412
16
Where the laws are
200712
17
Stereoscopic Vision: Persons, Freedom, and Two Spaces of Material Inference
200711
18 200011
19
Defending moral particularism
200610
20 20099

About Mark Lance

Mark Lance is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (238 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (56 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations) and Language and Linguistics (54 citations). Mark Lance has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Kukla, Margaret Olivia Little, John O'Leary‐Hawthorne, Philip Kremer, Todd May, Alessandra Tanesini, John Hawthorne and Michael P. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Noûs, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026