Philip Kremer
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- Grigori Mint︠s︡Mark LanceMichael KremerAlasdair UrquhartHelmut SchwichtenbergGeert Jan GroeneveldMonique van VelzenJoseph V. Pergolizzi
- Topics
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (20 papers)Advanced Algebra and Logic (13 papers)Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Computational Theory and MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Philip Kremer
27 papers receiving 202 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Artificial Intelligence 189
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 139
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- Philosophy 26
- Computer Networks and Communications 23
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Kremer
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Kremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Kremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Kremer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Kremer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Kremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Kremer. The network helps show where Philip Kremer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Kremer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Kremer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Kremer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Kremer. Philip Kremer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | Axiomatizing the next-interior fragment of dynamic topological logic | 7 |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Philip Kremer
Philip Kremer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (20 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (13 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (139 citations), Artificial Intelligence (189 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations). Philip Kremer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Grigori Mint︠s︡, Mark Lance, Michael Kremer, Alasdair Urquhart, Helmut Schwichtenberg, Geert Jan Groeneveld, Monique van Velzen, Joseph V. Pergolizzi, Albert Dahan and Antonio Montalbán. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Synthese and Journal of Symbolic Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.