Mark L. Schoene
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Maurits W. van TulderChristopher G. MaherRoger ChouRick DeyoGert BrønfortAndrea D FurlanAntti MalmivaaraTerry P. Corbin
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark L. Schoene
13 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Pharmacology 957
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 468
- Surgery 319
- Psychiatry and Mental health 209
- Economics and Econometrics 207
Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Schoene
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Schoene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Schoene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Schoene more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Schoene
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Schoene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Schoene. The network helps show where Mark L. Schoene may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark L. Schoene
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark L. Schoene. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark L. Schoene based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark L. Schoene. Mark L. Schoene is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back painbreakdown → | 287 |
| 4 | 2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Groupbreakdown → | 546 |
| 5 | Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back painbreakdown → | 274 |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 95 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Advances in the field of low back pain in primary care | 12 |
About Mark L. Schoene
Mark L. Schoene is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (957 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (468 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (127 citations). Mark L. Schoene has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Maurits W. van Tulder, Christopher G. Maher, Roger Chou, Rick Deyo, Gert Brønfort, Andrea D Furlan, Antti Malmivaara, Terry P. Corbin, Wilco C. Peul and Richard A. Deyo. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Pain and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.