Adam M. Pearson
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 29
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 41
- Surgery top 2%
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 25
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 6
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
-
- Medical Imaging and Analysis 8
-
- Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics 6
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 5
-
- Pregnancy-related medical research 4
- Co-authors
- Paul C. IvancicManohar M. PanjabiJon D. LurieJames N. WeinsteinWilliam A. AbduWenyan ZhaoShigeki ItoTor D. Tosteson
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Adam M. Pearson
53 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Pharmacology 1.3k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.3k
- Surgery 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 145
- Occupational Therapy 34
Countries citing papers authored by Adam M. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam M. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam M. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam M. Pearson. The network helps show where Adam M. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Adam M. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 70 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 183 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 40 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 52 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 86 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 70 |
About Adam M. Pearson
Adam M. Pearson is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (41 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (29 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (25 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (8 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (6 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.3k citations) and Surgery (1.4k citations). Adam M. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul C. Ivancic, Manohar M. Panjabi, Jon D. Lurie, James N. Weinstein, William A. Abdu, Wenyan Zhao, Shigeki Ito, Tor D. Tosteson, Richard M. Satava and Anthony G. Gallagher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Pain and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.