Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines
Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies
2016863 citationsA. Fayaz, Peter Croft et al.BMJ Openprofile →
The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A systematic search and summary of the literature
2008670 citationsPeter Croft et al.BMC Musculoskeletal Disordersprofile →
OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part I: Critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Croft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Croft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Croft more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Croft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Croft. The network helps show where Peter Croft may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Croft
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Croft.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Croft based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Croft. Peter Croft is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fayaz, A., Peter Croft, Richard Langford, Liam Donaldson, & Gareth T. Jones. (2016). Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies. BMJ Open. 6(6). e010364–e010364.863 indexed citations breakdown →
Ostelo, Raymond, Rick Deyo, Paul W. Stratford, et al.. (2008). Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain. Spine. 33(1). 90–94.1541 indexed citations breakdown →
Shapley, Mark D., Joanne L. Jordan, & Peter Croft. (2006). A systematic review of postcoital bleeding and risk of cervical cancer.. PubMed. 56(527). 453–60.44 indexed citations
10.
Mallen, Christian, George Peat, Elaine Thomas, & Peter Croft. (2006). Is chronic pain in adulthood related to childhood factors? A population-based case-control study of young adults.. PubMed. 33(11). 2286–90.14 indexed citations
McCall, Iain W., et al.. (2003). STRUCTURAL CERVICAL SPINE ABNORMALITIES AND SHOULDER REGION PAIN: IS THERE AN ASSOCIATION?. Lara D. Veeken. 42. 36–36.4 indexed citations
Phelan, Michael, et al.. (2002). A community pharmacy based survey of users of over the counter sleep aids. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 269(7213). 287–290.11 indexed citations
17.
Silman, A J, et al.. (2001). The syndrome of symptomatic adult acetabular dysplasia (SAAD syndrome). Lara D. Veeken. 40. 77–77.2 indexed citations
18.
Welton, Mark L., et al.. (1999). General practitioners' use of aspirin in the secondary prevention of vascular events: knowledge, attitudes, and current practice.. British Journal of General Practice. 49(445). 607–610.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.