Mark Hochhauser

37 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Mark Hochhauser
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • General Health Professions 155
  • Clinical Psychology 79
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 102
Replace Jacqueline Butler with:
Jacqueline Butler United States
Beatrice Annaheim Switzerland
Iva Pejnović Franelić Croatia
Deborah Nahom United States
V. Guagliardo France
Florentine de Groot Australia
Manuel Sánchez‐García Spain
Donald W. Helme United States
Rowena Merritt United Kingdom
Shereen Khatapoush United States
Mark Hochhauser relative to Jacqueline Butler United States Jacqueline Butler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jacqueline Butler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hochhauser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hochhauser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hochhauser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hochhauser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hochhauser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hochhauser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hochhauser. The network helps show where Mark Hochhauser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hochhauser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Hochhauser Line = papers co-authored together Mark Hochhauser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983154
2 198238
3 200626
4 199719
5 199918
6 200017
7 197316
8 200214
9
The continuing critical issue is health literacy.
200312
10 197911
11 198910
12 19779
13 20098
14 19756
15 20085
16 19815
17 19785
18 19995
19
Drug Education: Who Teaches What to Whom?.
19804
20 20034

About Mark Hochhauser

Mark Hochhauser is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), General Health Professions (155 citations), Clinical Psychology (79 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (102 citations). Mark Hochhauser has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Needle, Hamilton I. McCubbin, Jon Lorence, Dianne C. Berry, Andrew Ahlgren, Harry Fowler, Ruth M. Parker, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow and George J. Wischner. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Information Journal, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, IRB Ethics and Human Research, Journal of Drug Education and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact