Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

2.2k papers and 45.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs in the last decades have received a total of 45.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs usually cover Epidemiology (827 papers), Clinical Psychology (760 papers) and Pharmacology (443 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (668 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (408 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (352 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs are Maria Yellow Horse Brave Heart, Donald R. Wesson, Walter Ling, David E. Nichols, Timothy P. Carmody, Christine E. Grella, Ronald K. Siegel, Eloise Dunlap, George De Leon and George Greer.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Psychoactive Drugs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Psychoactive Drugs more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025