IRB Ethics and Human Research

520 papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 520 papers published in IRB Ethics and Human Research in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in IRB Ethics and Human Research usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (227 papers), General Health Professions (136 papers) and Physiology (98 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in Clinical Research (192 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (96 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (93 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IRB Ethics and Human Research are Benjamin Freedman, Ruth Macklin, Christine Grady, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert J. Levine, Charles Weijer, Sam Horng, Charles W. Lidz, Eric Kodish and Thomas Grisso.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in IRB Ethics and Human Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IRB Ethics and Human Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IRB Ethics and Human Research.

Countries where authors publish in IRB Ethics and Human Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IRB Ethics and Human Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IRB Ethics and Human Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IRB Ethics and Human Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025