Florentine de Groot
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Peter MillerPeter KremerNicolas DrosteNarelle RobertsonMichael SmithLauren CarpenterAndrea de SilvaBoyd Swinburn
- Topics
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Florentine de Groot
8 papers receiving 458 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 215
- General Health Professions 190
- Epidemiology 110
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 54
- Psychiatry and Mental health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Florentine de Groot
This map shows the geographic impact of Florentine de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Florentine de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florentine de Groot more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Florentine de Groot
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Florentine de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Florentine de Groot. The network helps show where Florentine de Groot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Florentine de Groot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Florentine de Groot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Florentine de Groot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Florentine de Groot. Florentine de Groot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | |
| 2 | 102 | |
| 3 | Dealing with alcohol-related harm and the night-time economy | 17 |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 73 | |
| 6 | 236 | |
| 7 | VicRoads commissioned report - Literature review & recommendations for facilitated peer discussion program to support young driver safety in year 11 | 1 |
| 8 | Romp & chomp : Healthy eating and active play for Geelong under 5s : Process report for objective 1 | 1 |
| 9 | Prevalentie van middelenproblemen en dubbeldiagnose in Belgische psychiatrische ziekenhuizen | 1 |
About Florentine de Groot
Florentine de Groot is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (48 citations), General Health Professions (190 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (215 citations). Florentine de Groot has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Miller, Peter Kremer, Nicolas Droste, Narelle Robertson, Michael Smith, Lauren Carpenter, Andrea de Silva, Boyd Swinburn, Rachel Boak and Colin Bell. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Addiction and Journal of science and medicine in sport.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.