Mark E. Berg
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Randolph C. GraceBrian J. SpieringMatthew S. MurphyRobert G. CookF. Gregory AshbyJoana ArantesRené Olivares‐NavarreteKelly Hotchkiss
- Topics
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies (8 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsPsychonomic Bulletin & ReviewAnnals of Biomedical Engineering
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesPortugal
In The Last Decade
Mark E. Berg
15 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 147
- Cognitive Neuroscience 83
- Social Psychology 61
- Biomedical Engineering 52
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Berg
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Berg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Berg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Berg. The network helps show where Mark E. Berg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Berg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Berg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Berg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Berg. Mark E. Berg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 86 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 13 |
About Mark E. Berg
Mark E. Berg is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Animal Science and Zoology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 15 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (147 citations), Developmental Biology (18 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (83 citations). Mark E. Berg has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Randolph C. Grace, Brian J. Spiering, Matthew S. Murphy, Robert G. Cook, F. Gregory Ashby, Joana Arantes, René Olivares‐Navarrete, Kelly Hotchkiss, Barbara D. Boyan and Zvi Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review and Annals of Biomedical Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.