Trix Cacchione

541 total citations
30 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

Trix Cacchione is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Trix Cacchione has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 18 papers in Social Psychology and 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Trix Cacchione's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (20 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (10 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers). Trix Cacchione is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (20 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (10 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers). Trix Cacchione collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Trix Cacchione's co-authors include Josep Call, Federica Amici, Horst Krist, Robert M. Zingg, Hannes Rakoczy, Juliane Bräuer, Judith M. Burkart, Carla Sebastián‐Enesco, Wenke Möhring and Matthias Allritz and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Developmental Psychology and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Trix Cacchione

27 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Trix Cacchione Switzerland 11 178 147 84 70 56 30 301
Ágnes Erdőhegyi Hungary 5 203 1.1× 185 1.3× 62 0.7× 269 3.8× 56 1.0× 7 446
Claude Dumas Canada 12 290 1.6× 280 1.9× 124 1.5× 132 1.9× 51 0.9× 34 534
Nicholas J. Mulcahy Australia 8 355 2.0× 392 2.7× 208 2.5× 100 1.4× 81 1.4× 11 610
Hideko Takeshita Japan 10 173 1.0× 198 1.3× 146 1.7× 42 0.6× 56 1.0× 23 359
Sebastian Dörrenberg Germany 6 171 1.0× 112 0.8× 84 1.0× 47 0.7× 23 0.4× 7 263
Ruth Sonnweber Austria 10 75 0.4× 101 0.7× 76 0.9× 27 0.4× 67 1.2× 20 284
Walter T. Herbranson United States 9 157 0.9× 56 0.4× 112 1.3× 17 0.2× 24 0.4× 23 322
Geertrui M. Spaepen United States 7 217 1.2× 136 0.9× 105 1.3× 22 0.3× 131 2.3× 7 422
Timothy M. Flemming United States 11 214 1.2× 206 1.4× 137 1.6× 21 0.3× 76 1.4× 21 411
А. А. Смирнова Russia 9 164 0.9× 183 1.2× 85 1.0× 21 0.3× 21 0.4× 40 398

Countries citing papers authored by Trix Cacchione

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Trix Cacchione's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trix Cacchione with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trix Cacchione more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Trix Cacchione

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trix Cacchione. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trix Cacchione. The network helps show where Trix Cacchione may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Trix Cacchione

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Trix Cacchione. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Trix Cacchione based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Trix Cacchione. Trix Cacchione is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cacchione, Trix, et al.. (2025). Are primary schools ready for immersive virtual reality? Resistance among stakeholders. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 12(1). 1304–1304.
2.
Martarelli, Corinna, et al.. (2024). Virtual reality in primary science education: improving knowledge of the water cycle. Educational Technology Research and Development. 73(2). 999–1024.
3.
Mast, Fred W., et al.. (2021). The prioritization of visuo-spatial associations during mental imagery. Cognitive Processing. 22(2). 227–237. 3 indexed citations
4.
Cacchione, Trix & Federica Amici. (2020). Insights from comparative research on social and cultural learning. Progress in brain research. 254. 247–270. 3 indexed citations
5.
Cacchione, Trix, et al.. (2020). Object Individuation in the Absence of Kind-specific Surface Features: Evidence for a Primordial Essentialist Stance?. Journal of Cognition and Development. 21(4). 534–550. 1 indexed citations
6.
Amici, Federica, Alejandro Sánchez-Amaro, Carla Sebastián‐Enesco, et al.. (2019). The word order of languages predicts native speakers’ working memory. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 1124–1124. 28 indexed citations
7.
Amici, Federica, et al.. (2019). Sloth bears (Melursus ursinus) fail to spontaneously solve a novel problem even if social cues and relevant experience are provided.. Journal of comparative psychology. 133(3). 373–379. 4 indexed citations
8.
Amici, Federica, et al.. (2018). Domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus) fail to intuitively reason about object properties like solidity and weight. Animal Cognition. 21(3). 441–446. 3 indexed citations
9.
Amici, Federica, et al.. (2017). Understanding of object properties by sloth bears, Melursus ursinus ursinus. Animal Behaviour. 134. 217–222. 7 indexed citations
10.
Cacchione, Trix, et al.. (2016). Are apes essentialists? Scope and limits of psychological essentialism in great apes. Animal Cognition. 19(5). 921–937. 12 indexed citations
12.
Cacchione, Trix, et al.. (2012). Fourteen-month-old infants infer the continuous identity of objects on the basis of nonvisible causal properties.. Developmental Psychology. 49(7). 1325–1329. 22 indexed citations
13.
Cacchione, Trix, et al.. (2012). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus) quantify split solid objects. Animal Cognition. 16(1). 1–10. 13 indexed citations
14.
Bräuer, Juliane, et al.. (2012). The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica). Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 141(1-2). 25–35. 51 indexed citations
15.
Cacchione, Trix & Judith M. Burkart. (2011). Dissociation between seeing and acting: Insights from common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behavioural Processes. 89(1). 52–60. 9 indexed citations
16.
Möhring, Wenke, et al.. (2011). On the origin of the understanding of time, speed, and distance interrelations. Infant Behavior and Development. 35(1). 22–28. 3 indexed citations
17.
Cacchione, Trix & Josep Call. (2010). Do gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) fail to represent objects in the context of cohesion violations?. Cognition. 116(2). 193–203. 14 indexed citations
18.
Cacchione, Trix, Josep Call, & Robert M. Zingg. (2009). Gravity and solidity in four great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus): Vertical and horizontal variations of the table task.. Journal of comparative psychology. 123(2). 168–180. 24 indexed citations
19.
Cacchione, Trix & Josep Call. (2009). Intuitions about gravity and solidity in great apes: the tubes task. Developmental Science. 13(2). 320–330. 17 indexed citations
20.
Cacchione, Trix & Horst Krist. (2004). Recognizing Impossible Object Relations: Intuitions About Support in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).. Journal of comparative psychology. 118(2). 140–148. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026