Mark C. Bowler

531 total citations
24 papers, 369 citations indexed

About

Mark C. Bowler is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark C. Bowler has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 369 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mark C. Bowler's work include Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers). Mark C. Bowler is often cited by papers focused on Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers). Mark C. Bowler collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark C. Bowler's co-authors include David J. Woehr, Stephen P. Kilgus, Nathaniel P. von der Embse, Scott A. Methe, Alexander M. Schoemann, Dan J. Putka, John G. Cope, Angela L. Lamson, Sy Atezaz Saeed and Jennifer L. Hodgson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Mark C. Bowler

24 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark C. Bowler United States 11 133 111 74 67 66 24 369
Pedro M. Hontangas Spain 12 160 1.2× 119 1.1× 62 0.8× 78 1.2× 106 1.6× 22 456
Martin Kersting Germany 10 136 1.0× 110 1.0× 46 0.6× 77 1.1× 34 0.5× 42 422
Gail H. Weems United States 8 89 0.7× 69 0.6× 64 0.9× 85 1.3× 42 0.6× 8 350
Matthew J. Borneman United States 6 66 0.5× 74 0.7× 85 1.1× 57 0.9× 34 0.5× 10 298
Clemens Draxler Austria 4 112 0.8× 83 0.7× 47 0.6× 41 0.6× 68 1.0× 8 349
Daniel Morillo Spain 8 67 0.5× 88 0.8× 58 0.8× 34 0.5× 79 1.2× 17 374
Yilin Andre Wang United States 6 139 1.0× 97 0.9× 125 1.7× 27 0.4× 27 0.4× 9 413
Peter Thunholm Sweden 6 106 0.8× 55 0.5× 40 0.5× 29 0.4× 41 0.6× 14 330
Norman G. Johnston Canada 7 157 1.2× 189 1.7× 104 1.4× 25 0.4× 37 0.6× 9 391
Sabrina Trapmann Germany 6 187 1.4× 147 1.3× 65 0.9× 172 2.6× 34 0.5× 7 486

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Bowler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Bowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Bowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Bowler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Bowler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Bowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Bowler. The network helps show where Mark C. Bowler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark C. Bowler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark C. Bowler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark C. Bowler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark C. Bowler. Mark C. Bowler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lamson, Angela L., et al.. (2019). Improving Detection of Depression Symptoms in Latino Farmworkers: Latino Farmworker Affective Scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 41(2). 250–266. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2019). Implicit and explicit creativity: Further evidence of the integrative model. Personality and Individual Differences. 154. 109643–109643. 8 indexed citations
3.
Lamson, Angela L., et al.. (2018). Latino Farmworkers and Under-Detection of Depression: A Review of the Literature. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 40(2). 210–226. 7 indexed citations
4.
Embse, Nathaniel P. von der, et al.. (2016). The influence of test-based accountability policies on teacher stress and instructional practices: a moderated mediation model. Educational Psychology. 37(3). 312–331. 35 indexed citations
5.
Lamson, Angela L., et al.. (2015). Screening for Depression in Latino Immigrants: A Systematic Review of Depression Screening Instruments Translated into Spanish. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 18(4). 787–798. 19 indexed citations
6.
Jaffery, Rose, Austin H. Johnson, Mark C. Bowler, et al.. (2015). Using Consensus Building Procedures With Expert Raters to Establish Comparison Scores of Behavior for Direct Behavior Rating. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 40(4). 195–204. 3 indexed citations
7.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2014). Evaluating the fakability of a conditional reasoning test of addiction proneness. International Journal of Psychology. 49(5). 415–419. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2013). Measurement issues associated with conditional reasoning tests: An examination of faking. Personality and Individual Differences. 55(5). 459–464. 13 indexed citations
9.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2013). A Statistical Correction to 20 years of Banding. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 21(1). 46–56. 2 indexed citations
10.
Woehr, David J., John P. Meriac, & Mark C. Bowler. (2012). Methods and Data Analysis for Assessment Centers. 45–67. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2012). A Meta-Analysis of Workaholism. International Journal of Business and Management. 7(11). 41 indexed citations
12.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2012). Further Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Complexity on the Five-Factor Model. Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal. 40(7). 1083–1097. 7 indexed citations
13.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2011). The Cognitive Underpinnings of Addiction. Substance Use & Misuse. 46(8). 1060–1071. 11 indexed citations
14.
Woehr, David J., Dan J. Putka, & Mark C. Bowler. (2011). An Examination of G-Theory Methods for Modeling Multitrait–Multimethod Data. Organizational Research Methods. 15(1). 134–161. 23 indexed citations
15.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2011). The Impact of Interpersonal Aggression on Performance Attributions. Group & Organization Management. 36(4). 427–465. 11 indexed citations
16.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2010). The impact of aggressive individuals on team training. Personality and Individual Differences. 49(2). 88–94. 10 indexed citations
17.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2010). The Cognitive Interview for Eyewitnesses with Autism Spectrum. 1 indexed citations
18.
Bowler, Mark C. & David J. Woehr. (2009). Assessment center construct-related validity: Stepping beyond the MTMM matrix. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 75(2). 173–182. 16 indexed citations
19.
Bowler, Mark C., et al.. (2009). The Big-5±2? The impact of cognitive complexity on the factor structure of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences. 47(8). 979–984. 21 indexed citations
20.
Bowler, Mark C. & David J. Woehr. (2006). A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91(5). 1114–1124. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026