Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Car-following: a historical review
1999961 citationsMark Brackstone, Mike McDonaldprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Brackstone
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Brackstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Brackstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Brackstone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Brackstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Brackstone. The network helps show where Mark Brackstone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Brackstone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Brackstone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Brackstone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Brackstone. Mark Brackstone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Casas, Jordi, et al.. (2015). Modelling and Simulation of Mixed Traffic. Transport Research Forum.6 indexed citations
3.
Brackstone, Mark, et al.. (2013). Guidelines for Micro Simulation Modelling; Calibration and Validation; An Examination of Gaps, Issues and Needs. Traffic engineering & control. 55(5).1 indexed citations
Brackstone, Mark, et al.. (2002). Modeling the Dynamic Cut-In Situation. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1803(1). 45–51.16 indexed citations
10.
Brackstone, Mark, et al.. (2001). THE USE OF PROBE VEHICLES ON MOTORWAYS, SOME EMPIRICAL OBSERVATIONS.9 indexed citations
Brackstone, Mark, et al.. (1999). A collision model for the assessment of the safety benefits of AVCSS. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
Wu, Jianping, Mark McDonald, & Mark Brackstone. (1998). A fuzzy logic microscopic simulation model for interurban ATT assessment. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).7 indexed citations
19.
Brackstone, Mark & M. McDonald. (1995). MODELING OF MOTORWAY OPERATIONS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 56–60.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.