Mark Boroush

452 total citations
10 papers, 312 citations indexed

About

Mark Boroush is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Boroush has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 312 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 1 paper in Social Psychology and 1 paper in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Mark Boroush's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (1 paper) and Risk Perception and Management (1 paper). Mark Boroush is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers), Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (1 paper) and Risk Perception and Management (1 paper). Mark Boroush collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Mark Boroush's co-authors include Robert H. Knopp, John B. O’Sullivan, Stuart L. Hart, Nirmala Kannankutty, Martha Naomi Alt, Raymond M. Wolfe, Mark C. Regets, Lawrence Burton, Xianglei Chen and Michael J. Gough and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects and Metabolism.

In The Last Decade

Mark Boroush

10 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Boroush United States 6 87 72 48 39 34 10 312
J. R. Shackleton United Kingdom 9 117 1.3× 13 0.2× 113 2.4× 15 0.4× 6 0.2× 50 600
Harini Kannan United States 7 141 1.6× 89 1.2× 46 1.0× 6 0.2× 6 0.2× 10 317
Madeeha Gohar Qureshi Pakistan 12 17 0.2× 56 0.8× 52 1.1× 21 0.5× 6 0.2× 18 298
Richard Sedlmayr United Kingdom 3 8 0.1× 50 0.7× 70 1.5× 18 0.5× 20 0.6× 8 342
Robert H. Schaffer United States 7 32 0.4× 12 0.2× 24 0.5× 68 1.7× 8 0.2× 19 294
Jamie M. Chen United States 11 55 0.6× 33 0.5× 202 4.2× 22 0.6× 4 0.1× 22 358
Beryl Lieff Benderly United States 6 83 1.0× 49 0.7× 31 0.6× 25 0.6× 17 0.5× 79 284
Eva Vivalt United States 6 26 0.3× 65 0.9× 66 1.4× 10 0.3× 4 0.1× 11 250
Thomas A. Wyatt United States 6 59 0.7× 19 0.3× 72 1.5× 128 3.3× 4 0.1× 16 350
David Rooke United Kingdom 5 35 0.4× 20 0.3× 28 0.6× 23 0.6× 12 0.4× 8 269

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Boroush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Boroush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Boroush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Boroush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Boroush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Boroush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Boroush. The network helps show where Mark Boroush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Boroush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Boroush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Boroush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Boroush. Mark Boroush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Alt, Martha Naomi, Xianglei Chen, Lawrence Burton, et al.. (2010). Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. NSB 10-01.. 182 indexed citations
2.
Boroush, Mark & Michael J. Gough. (1994). Can Cohort Studies Detect Any Human Cancer Excess That May Result from Exposure to Dioxin? Maybe. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 20(2). 198–210. 6 indexed citations
3.
Boroush, Mark & Charles Thomas. (1992). Alternative scenarios for the Defense Industry after 1995. Planning Review. 20(3). 24–29. 3 indexed citations
4.
Covello, Vincent T., et al.. (1988). Cooperation Versus Confrontation: A Comparison of Approaches to Environmental Risk Management in Japan and the United States1. Risk Analysis. 8(2). 247–260. 8 indexed citations
5.
Hart, Stuart L., et al.. (1985). Managing Complexity through Consensus Mapping: Technology for the Structuring of Group Decisions. Academy of Management Review. 10(3). 587–587. 14 indexed citations
6.
Hart, Stuart L., et al.. (1985). Managing Complexity Through Consensus Mapping: Technology for the Structuring of Group Decisions. Academy of Management Review. 10(3). 587–600. 36 indexed citations
7.
Boroush, Mark, et al.. (1980). Technology assessment : creative futures : perspectives from and beyond the second international congress. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 4 indexed citations
8.
Kawamura, K., Mark Boroush, Kan Chen, & Alexander N. Christakis. (1979). Design for a technology. Futures. 11(4). 299–311. 4 indexed citations
9.
Kass, Lawrence & Mark Boroush. (1976). 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate-dependent methyltransferase activity in chronic erythremic myelosis and other types of anemias. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 437(2). 639–642. 3 indexed citations
10.
Knopp, Robert H., Mark Boroush, & John B. O’Sullivan. (1975). Lipid metabolism in pregnancy. II. Postheparin lipolytic activity and hypertriglyceridemia in the pregnant rat. Metabolism. 24(4). 481–493. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026