Mark A. Austen
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
Papers in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 3
- Co-authors
- Teresa J. HudsonJohn C. FortneyBradley C. MartinJames S. WilliamsMark J. EdlundMark D. SullivanRichard R. OwenCarol R. Thrush
- Journals
- Pain (3 papers)Psychiatric Services (3 papers)Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1 paper)Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics (1 paper)Kluwer Law International eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark A. Austen
10 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 91
- Medical Terminology 2
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 180
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 24
- Health Information Management 24
Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Austen
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Austen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Austen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Austen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Austen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Austen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Austen. The network helps show where Mark A. Austen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark A. Austen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 47 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 10 | Basic legal documents on international animal welfare and wildlife conservation | 2000 | 2 |
About Mark A. Austen
Mark A. Austen is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health Information Management, Pharmacology and General Health Professions, having authored 10 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), International Environmental Law and Policies (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Health and Wellbeing Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (91 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (180 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (24 citations) and Health Information Management (24 citations). Mark A. Austen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Teresa J. Hudson, John C. Fortney, Bradley C. Martin, James S. Williams, Mark J. Edlund, Mark D. Sullivan, Richard R. Owen, Carol R. Thrush, Jacob T. Painter and Weiwei Feng. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Psychiatric Services, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Kluwer Law International eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.