James S. Williams

2.0k total citations
66 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

James S. Williams is a scholar working on Genetics, Clinical Psychology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, James S. Williams has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Genetics, 9 papers in Clinical Psychology and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in James S. Williams's work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Microscopic Colitis (4 papers). James S. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Microscopic Colitis (4 papers). James S. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. James S. Williams's co-authors include John Read, David W. Crumpacker, John C. Fortney, Paul W. Mielke, Teresa J. Hudson, Bradley C. Martin, Mark J. Edlund, Mark A. Austen, Kenneth J. Berry and Peter J. Brockwell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Genetics.

In The Last Decade

James S. Williams

61 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James S. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 208
  • Genetics 192
  • Epidemiology 148
  • Pharmacology 135
  • Surgery 119
Replace Helen Brown with:
Helen Brown United Kingdom
Florence Vorspan France
Katja Schmidt Germany
Kord M. Kober United States
Ranjini Natarajan United States
Tom Kirkwood United Kingdom
Ronald J. Feise United States
Paul A. Khan Canada
Fan He China
Kathryn T. Hall United States
Helen Brown United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James S. Williams
James S. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James S. Williams
James S. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James S. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James S. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James S. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James S. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James S. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James S. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James S. Williams. The network helps show where James S. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James S. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James S. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James S. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James S. Williams. James S. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 4
4 9
5 1
6 115
7 40
8 75
9 23
10 6
11 10
12 15
13 34
14 12
15 10
16 6
17 10
18 25
19 1
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026