Jeffrey M. Pyne
- General Health Professions top 0.2%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Co-authors
- Geoffrey M. CurranBrian S. MittmanMark S. BauerCheryl B. StetlerJohn C. FortneyMark J. EdlundDinesh MittalDavid Williams
- Topics
- Mental Health Treatment and Access (48 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (36 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of PsychiatryJournal of Abnormal Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsJapan
In The Last Decade
Jeffrey M. Pyne
147 papers receiving 7.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- General Health Professions 3.1k
- Clinical Psychology 2.2k
- Social Psychology 1.4k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey M. Pyne
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey M. Pyne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey M. Pyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey M. Pyne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey M. Pyne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey M. Pyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey M. Pyne. The network helps show where Jeffrey M. Pyne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeffrey M. Pyne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeffrey M. Pyne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeffrey M. Pyne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeffrey M. Pyne. Jeffrey M. Pyne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 134 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 98 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | Virtual reality and other experiential therapies for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder | 15 |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 66 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Jeffrey M. Pyne
Jeffrey M. Pyne is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 150 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (48 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (36 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (737 citations), General Health Professions (3.1k citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.2k citations). Jeffrey M. Pyne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey M. Curran, Brian S. Mittman, Mark S. Bauer, Cheryl B. Stetler, John C. Fortney, Mark J. Edlund, Dinesh Mittal, David Williams, Greer Sullivan and Teresa J. Hudson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.