This map shows the geographic impact of Marina Orio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marina Orio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marina Orio more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marina Orio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marina Orio. The network helps show where Marina Orio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marina Orio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marina Orio.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marina Orio based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marina Orio. Marina Orio is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Orio, Marina, S. Ciroi, E. Aydi, et al.. (2024). V407 Lup, an intermediate polar nova. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 533(2). 1541–1549.1 indexed citations
Aydi, E., Jay Strader, Laura Chomiuk, et al.. (2021). Spectroscopic follow up of the classical nova V6595 Sgr (PNV J17581670-2914490). The astronomer's telegram. 14533. 1.1 indexed citations
5.
Sokolovsky, K. V., E. Aydi, Laura Chomiuk, et al.. (2020). Super-soft X-ray emission of Nova Reticuli 2020. The astronomer's telegram. 14043. 1.1 indexed citations
6.
Drake, J. J., et al.. (2020). Chandra high resolution X-ray spectroscopy of Nova Ret 2020. The astronomer's telegram. 14214. 1.1 indexed citations
7.
Sokolovsky, K. V., E. Aydi, Laura Chomiuk, et al.. (2020). NuSTAR detection of Nova Reticuli 2020 = MGAB-V207. The astronomer's telegram. 13900. 1.1 indexed citations
8.
Orio, Marina, S. Ciroi, E. Aydi, & D. A. H. Buckley. (2019). Optical spectra of Nova SMC 2016a at quiescence. The astronomer's telegram. 12385. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Buckley, D. A. H., et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190923y: optical spectrum of MASTER detected transient. GCN. 25903. 1.
10.
Beardmore, A. P., et al.. (2017). Detection of a 9.4 min periodicity in the XMM-Newton and Chandra X-ray light curves of V407 Lup (Nova Lup 2016). ATel. 10749. 1.1 indexed citations
11.
Orio, Marina, K. Mukai, & M. Della Valle. (2016). An X-ray source associated with a Vista Variables Survey nova candidate nova. ATel. 8625. 1.1 indexed citations
12.
Orio, Marina, et al.. (2012). Chandra X-ray grating observation of Nova LMC 2012. ATel. 4092. 1.1 indexed citations
13.
Schlegel, E. M., Ashley Pagnotta, K. L. Page, et al.. (2010). Emergence of the Supersoft X-ray Phase of U Sco. ATel. 2430. 1.5 indexed citations
14.
Bode, M. F., J. P. Osborne, K. L. Page, et al.. (2009). A 1.19 day UV Photometric Period in Nova LMC 2009. The astronomer's telegram. 2001. 1.1 indexed citations
15.
Osborne, J. P., K. L. Page, A. P. Beardmore, et al.. (2009). Early X-ray detection of Nova Ophiuchi 2009 / V2672 Oph. ATel. 2173. 1.1 indexed citations
16.
Osborne, J. P., K. L. Page, P. A. Evans, et al.. (2008). Nova V2491 Cyg has become a bright super-soft source. ATel. 1542. 1.2 indexed citations
17.
Zezas, A. & Marina Orio. (2008). The symbiotic star SMC 3. The astronomer's telegram. 1379. 1.1 indexed citations
Orio, Marina. (2004). X-ray observations of classical and recurrent novae in\n\nOutburst. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.