Daniel Harbeck

5.9k total citations
53 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Daniel Harbeck is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Harbeck has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 27 papers in Instrumentation and 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Daniel Harbeck's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (34 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (27 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (14 papers). Daniel Harbeck is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (34 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (27 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (14 papers). Daniel Harbeck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Daniel Harbeck's co-authors include E. K. Grebel, Andreas Koch, Graeme H. Smith, Rosemary F. Ġ. Wyse, G. Gilmore, M. I. Wilkinson, Jan Kleyna, J. S. Gallagher, Elena Sabbi and N. W. Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Harbeck

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Harbeck United States 20 1.4k 735 89 48 28 53 1.4k
Ryan L. Sanders United States 21 1.5k 1.1× 632 0.9× 94 1.1× 44 0.9× 29 1.0× 68 1.5k
Hiroya Umeda Japan 10 923 0.7× 398 0.5× 149 1.7× 31 0.6× 42 1.5× 21 1.0k
Yechi Zhang Japan 10 904 0.7× 397 0.5× 146 1.6× 29 0.6× 43 1.5× 21 1.0k
R. N. Hook Germany 11 644 0.5× 283 0.4× 106 1.2× 49 1.0× 42 1.5× 52 718
J. E. Hibbard United States 19 1.6k 1.2× 662 0.9× 135 1.5× 61 1.3× 23 0.8× 36 1.6k
Irene Shivaei United States 18 1.2k 0.9× 529 0.7× 78 0.9× 44 0.9× 12 0.4× 61 1.2k
Igor Chilingarian Russia 22 1.4k 1.1× 806 1.1× 168 1.9× 46 1.0× 23 0.8× 69 1.5k
B. Épinat France 21 1.3k 1.0× 602 0.8× 107 1.2× 54 1.1× 25 0.9× 54 1.3k
David A. Thilker United States 25 1.9k 1.4× 696 0.9× 189 2.1× 52 1.1× 28 1.0× 69 2.0k
A. Burkert Germany 10 967 0.7× 506 0.7× 98 1.1× 40 0.8× 20 0.7× 13 993

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Harbeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Harbeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Harbeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Harbeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Harbeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Harbeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Harbeck. The network helps show where Daniel Harbeck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Harbeck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Harbeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Harbeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Harbeck. Daniel Harbeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Guillén, C. Cardona, N. Lodieu, V. J. S. Béjar, et al.. (2021). A young spectroscopic binary in a quintuple system part of the Local Association. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 654. A134–A134. 2 indexed citations
2.
Bachelet, E., Paweł Zieliński, M. Gromadzki, et al.. (2021). A spectroscopic follow-up for Gaia19bld. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 657. A17–A17. 2 indexed citations
3.
Siverd, Robert J., Stuart Barnes, Joseph R. Tufts, et al.. (2018). NRES: the network of robotic echelle spectrographs. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. 231–231. 9 indexed citations
4.
Orio, Marina, G. J. M. Luna, Ralf Kotulla, et al.. (2017). CXO J004318.8+412016, a steady supersoft X-ray source in M 31. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 470(2). 2212–2224. 1 indexed citations
5.
Harbeck, Daniel, Todd A. Boroson, Michael P. Lesser, et al.. (2014). The WIYN one degree imager 2014: performance of the partially populated focal plane and instrument upgrade path. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9147. 91470P–91470P. 11 indexed citations
6.
Harbeck, Daniel, et al.. (2010). The WIYN one degree imager: project update 2010. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7735. 77350G–77350G. 6 indexed citations
7.
Harbeck, Daniel, et al.. (2010). User interface software development for the WIYN One Degree Imager (ODI). Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7740. 774013–774013. 1 indexed citations
8.
Harbeck, Daniel, et al.. (2010). The WIYN ODI instrument software configuration and scripting. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7740. 77400N–77400N. 2 indexed citations
9.
Jacoby, George H., et al.. (2009). QUOTA - An Advanced Mosaic Imager. 213. 1 indexed citations
10.
Sabbi, Elena, J. S. Gallagher, M. Tosi, et al.. (2009). STAR FORMATION HISTORY OF THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD: SIXHUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE/ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEY FIELDS. The Astrophysical Journal. 703(1). 721–735. 26 indexed citations
11.
Harbeck, Daniel, et al.. (2008). The WIYN One Degree Imager. ASPC. 399. 489. 1 indexed citations
12.
Mello, D. F. de, L. J. Smith, Elena Sabbi, et al.. (2008). STAR FORMATION IN THE H I BRIDGE BETWEEN M81 AND M82. The Astronomical Journal. 135(2). 548–554. 42 indexed citations
13.
Wilkinson, M. I., Jan Kleyna, G. Gilmore, et al.. (2006). Probing the dark matter content of Local Group dwarf spheroidal galaxies with FLAMES. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 124. 25. 1 indexed citations
14.
Harbeck, Daniel, J. S. Gallagher, E. K. Grebel, Andreas Koch, & D. B. Zucker. (2005). Andromeda IX: Properties of the Faintest M31 Dwarf Satellite Galaxy. The Astrophysical Journal. 623(1). 159–163. 9 indexed citations
15.
Макарова, Л. Н., et al.. (2005). Imaging and photometry of nearby dwarf galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 433(2). 751–756. 9 indexed citations
16.
Pizagno, James, Francisco Prada, David H. Weinberg, et al.. (2005). Dark Matter and Stellar Mass in the Luminous Regions of Disk Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 633(2). 844–856. 53 indexed citations
17.
Grebel, E. K. & Daniel Harbeck. (2003). How Old are the Oldest Agedateable Populations in Dwarf Galaxies. 324(2). 90. 1 indexed citations
18.
Harbeck, Daniel, Graham Smith, & E. K. Grebel. (2003). CN variations in NGC 7006. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 409(2). 553–561. 7 indexed citations
19.
Pentericci, L., Hans‐Walter Rix, Francisco Prada, et al.. (2003). The near-IR properties and continuum shapes of high redshift quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 410(1). 75–82. 20 indexed citations
20.
Harbeck, Daniel, Graeme H. Smith, & E. K. Grebel. (2003). CN Abundance Variations on the Main Sequence of 47 Tucanae. The Astronomical Journal. 125(1). 197–207. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026