Countries citing papers authored by Bradley E. Schaefer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bradley E. Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bradley E. Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bradley E. Schaefer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bradley E. Schaefer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bradley E. Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bradley E. Schaefer. The network helps show where Bradley E. Schaefer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bradley E. Schaefer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bradley E. Schaefer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bradley E. Schaefer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bradley E. Schaefer. Bradley E. Schaefer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schaefer, Bradley E., et al.. (2014). Nova aquilae 1918 (V603 Aql) faded by 0.44 MAG per century from 1938 to 2013. Civil War Book Review.13 indexed citations
7.
Schaefer, Bradley E.. (2013). The Recurrent Nova T CrB did not errupt in the year 1842. Observatory. 133. 81–88.2 indexed citations
8.
Oksanen, A. & Bradley E. Schaefer. (2011). Detection of Photometric Modulation on the Orbital Period in the Eruption Tail of the Recurrent Nova T Pyx. The astronomer's telegram. 3782. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Schaefer, Bradley E., Ashley Pagnotta, M. J. Darnley, et al.. (2010). Discovery of the predicted 2010 eruption and the pre-eruption light curve for recurrent nova U scorpii. Civil War Book Review.16 indexed citations
10.
Pagnotta, Ashley, Bradley E. Schaefer, G. Handler, et al.. (2010). An Apparent Second Plateau in the UBVRIJHK Eruption Light Curve of the Recurrent Nova U Sco. ATel. 2507. 1.2 indexed citations
11.
Schaefer, Bradley E., Ashley Pagnotta, J. P. Osborne, et al.. (2010). Recurrent Nova U Sco Has Sharp Decline in X-ray/UV/Optical/IR. ATel. 2477. 1.3 indexed citations
12.
Höflich, Peter & Bradley E. Schaefer. (2009). X-ray and gamma-ray flashes from type ia supernovae?. Civil War Book Review.14 indexed citations
13.
Schaefer, Bradley E.. (2005). The Hubble Diagram to z=6.3 with Swift Gamma Ray Bursts. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 207.
14.
Quimby, R., E. S. Rykoff, & Bradley E. Schaefer. (2005). GRB050412: ROTSE-III optical limits.. GRB Coordinates Network. 3238. 1.
15.
Cherry, M. L., G. L. Case, J. Cravens, et al.. (2004). CASTER: A Scintillator-Based Black Hole Finder Probe. 8.1 indexed citations
16.
Schaefer, Bradley E.. (1999). Going to the Limit. Sky and Telescope. 97(5). 126.1 indexed citations
17.
Schaefer, Bradley E.. (1993). The Peak Brightness of SN1937C in IC4182 and the Hubble Constant. Civil War Book Review. 183.2 indexed citations
18.
Seidelmann, P. K., et al.. (1988). Moonwatch - July 14, 1988. Sky and Telescope. 76. 34.
19.
Schaefer, Bradley E.. (1988). Visibility of the lunar crescent. Quarterly journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 29(4). 511–523.14 indexed citations
20.
Schaefer, Bradley E.. (1988). The Astrophysics of Suntanning. Sky and Telescope. 75. 595.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.