Marijke Malsch
- Law top 5%
- Comparative and International Law Studies 7
- Criminal Law and Evidence 6
- Jury Decision Making Processes 5
-
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 4
-
- Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment 6
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 6
- Information Systems top 10%
-
- Dutch Social and Cultural Studies 6
-
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 3
Marijke Malsch
27 papers receiving 213 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Law 39
- Clinical Psychology 71
- Sociology and Political Science 108
- Social Psychology 43
- Information Systems 46
Countries citing papers authored by Marijke Malsch
This map shows the geographic impact of Marijke Malsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marijke Malsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marijke Malsch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marijke Malsch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marijke Malsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marijke Malsch. The network helps show where Marijke Malsch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Marijke Malsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 4 | Laat wetgever empirische kennis beter benutten | 2020 | 1 |
| 5 | 25 jaar empirisch-juridisch onderzoek in Nederland: Een inleiding tot de Encyclopedie ELS | 2020 | 1 |
| 6 | Slachtofferschap van online criminaliteit : Een onderzoek naar behoeften, gevolgen en verantwoordelijkheden na slachtofferschap van cybercrime en gedigitaliseerde criminaliteit | 2018 | 7 |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 9 | Het zichtbare slachtoffer: privacy van slachtoffers binnen het strafproces | 2015 | 2 |
| 10 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 11 | Democracy in the Courts: Lay Participation in European Criminal Justice Systems | 2013 | 9 |
| 12 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 16 | |
| 18 | Complex cases : perspective on the Netherlands criminal justice system | 1999 | 10 |
| 19 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 38 |
About Marijke Malsch
Marijke Malsch is a scholar working on Law, Pharmacy and General Social Sciences, having authored 36 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Comparative and International Law Studies (7 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (6 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (6 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (6 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (39 citations), Clinical Psychology (71 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (108 citations). Marijke Malsch has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Rutger Leukfeldt, Denise de Ridder, Marja Depla, J.W. de Keijser, Ian Freckelton, C.J. de Poot, Henk Elffers, Jonathan Jackson, Maurice B. Visscher and Eric Blaauw. Their work appears in journals such as International Review of Victimology, Law & Society Review, Punishment & Society, Journal of Criminal Justice and Behavioral Sciences & the Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.