Denise de Ridder
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 34
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 8
- Family Practice top 1%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 9
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 8
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 6
-
- Health, psychology, and well-being 12
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 8
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 8
Denise de Ridder
77 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- Family Practice 238
- General Decision Sciences 99
- Clinical Psychology 955
- Social Psychology 687
Countries citing papers authored by Denise de Ridder
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise de Ridder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise de Ridder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise de Ridder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise de Ridder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise de Ridder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise de Ridder. The network helps show where Denise de Ridder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise de Ridder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 7 | Promoting healthy product choices among (aware) cafeteria customers | 2016 | 1 |
| 8 | Emotional License: Negative emotions as justification for self-regulation failure | 2015 | 3 |
| 9 | Do consumers look at ingredient information on food packaging? Using the Choice-Blindness-Paradigm to assess attention | 2015 | 1 |
| 10 | What is in a nudge: putting the psychology back in nudges | 2015 | 3 |
| 11 | Nudging for beginners | 2014 | 3 |
| 12 | Why More Self-control Makes you Happier. Examining the Relationship Between Self-control, Regulatory Focus, and Happiness | 2014 | 1 |
| 13 | Nudging for beginners: A shortlist of issues in urgent need of research | 2014 | 11 |
| 14 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 101 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 438 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 63 |
About Denise de Ridder
Denise de Ridder is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Family Practice, having authored 78 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (34 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (12 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (8 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (8 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.1k citations), Family Practice (238 citations) and General Decision Sciences (99 citations). Denise de Ridder has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jozien M. Bensing, Marleen Gillebaart, Karlein M. G. Schreurs, Roeline G. Kuijer, Floor M. Kroese, Rinie Geenen, Henriët van Middendorp, Kentaro Fujita, Traci Mann and Marijda Fournier.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.