Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A ‘Cognitive Dimensions’ Framework
This map shows the geographic impact of Marian Petre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marian Petre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marian Petre more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marian Petre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marian Petre. The network helps show where Marian Petre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marian Petre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marian Petre.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marian Petre based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marian Petre. Marian Petre is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoek, André van der & Marian Petre. (2014). Software designers in action.1 indexed citations
2.
Minocha, Shaíley, et al.. (2013). Older People and Online Social Interactions: An Empirical Investigation. Open Research Online (The Open University). 12.2 indexed citations
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (2007). Measuring improvement in latent semantic analysis-based marking systems: using a computer to mark questions about HTML. Open Research Online (The Open University). 35–42.14 indexed citations
11.
Petre, Marian. (2007). Expert strategies for dealing with complex and intractable problems.. PPIG. 1.1 indexed citations
12.
Simon, Norma P., Sally Fincher, Anthony Robins, et al.. (2006). Predictors of success in a first programming course. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 52(5). 189–196.84 indexed citations
13.
Tolhurst, Denise, John Hamer, Ilona Box, et al.. (2006). Do map drawing styles of novice programmers predict success in programming?: a multi-national, multi-institutional study. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 52(5). 213–222.24 indexed citations
14.
Richards, Brad, Marian Petre, Sally Fincher, & Josh Tenenberg. (2003). 'My Criterion is: Is it a Boolean?': A card-sort elicitation of students' knowledge of programming constructs. Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound). 6(3).13 indexed citations
15.
Petre, Marian. (2003). Team coordination through externalised mental imagery.. Open Research Online (The Open University). 21.1 indexed citations
16.
Carswell, Linda, et al.. (2000). Distance education via the Internet: the student experience. Research Repository (Kingston University London).86 indexed citations
17.
Petre, Marian & Alan F. Blackwell. (1998). A glimpse of expert programmers' mental imagery.. PPIG. 9.1 indexed citations
18.
Petre, Marian, et al.. (1996). Cognitive Questions in Software Visualisation.7 indexed citations
19.
Petre, Marian. (1991). Shifts in reasoning about software and hardware systems: do operational models underpin declarative ones?. Open Research Online (The Open University). 7.5 indexed citations
20.
Petre, Marian & Thomas R. G. Green. (1990). Where to draw the line with text: Some claims by logic designers about graphics in notation. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 463–468.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.