Maria J. Crowe
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Michael S. BeattieJacqueline C. BresnahanDavid G. GreenhalghThomas DoetschmanRichard WenstrupRadhika P. AtitNancy RatnerFrank A. Pintar
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers)Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental NeurosciencePathology and Forensic MedicineCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Journals
- Nature MedicineBrain ResearchSpine
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaItaly
In The Last Decade
Maria J. Crowe
15 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 795
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 465
- Molecular Biology 318
- Neurology 273
- Developmental Neuroscience 254
Countries citing papers authored by Maria J. Crowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria J. Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria J. Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria J. Crowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria J. Crowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria J. Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria J. Crowe. The network helps show where Maria J. Crowe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria J. Crowe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria J. Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria J. Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria J. Crowe. Maria J. Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 166 | |
| 9 | 88 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeysbreakdown → | 978 |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 |
About Maria J. Crowe
Maria J. Crowe is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (254 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (795 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (465 citations). Maria J. Crowe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Beattie, Jacqueline C. Bresnahan, David G. Greenhalgh, Thomas Doetschman, Richard Wenstrup, Radhika P. Atit, Nancy Ratner, Frank A. Pintar, Shekar N. Kurpad and Arshak R. Alexanian. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, Brain Research and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.