Maria J. Crowe

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Maria J. Crowe is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Maria J. Crowe has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Maria J. Crowe's work include Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers). Maria J. Crowe is often cited by papers focused on Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers). Maria J. Crowe collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Maria J. Crowe's co-authors include Michael S. Beattie, Jacqueline C. Bresnahan, David G. Greenhalgh, Thomas Doetschman, Radhika P. Atit, Richard Wenstrup, Nancy Ratner, Arshak R. Alexanian, Frank A. Pintar and Shekar N. Kurpad and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, Brain Research and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Maria J. Crowe

15 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys

1997 978 citations Maria J. Crowe, Jacqueline C. Bresnahan et al. Nature Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Maria J. Crowe United States	12	795	465	318	273	254	15	1.5k
Hal X. Nguyen United States	16	561 0.7×	336 0.7×	529 1.7×	238 0.9×	168 0.7×	21	1.6k
Hyung Chun Park South Korea	16	420 0.5×	359 0.8×	243 0.8×	148 0.5×	164 0.6×	23	1.0k
Jennifer Wells Canada	9	425 0.5×	415 0.9×	343 1.1×	205 0.8×	191 0.8×	11	1.4k
Dongming Sun United States	22	367 0.5×	530 1.1×	764 2.4×	179 0.7×	255 1.0×	42	2.2k
M. N. Ghabriel Australia	22	300 0.4×	443 1.0×	340 1.1×	284 1.0×	146 0.6×	65	1.5k
William Puckett United States	11	720 0.9×	339 0.7×	125 0.4×	116 0.4×	153 0.6×	14	1.1k
Deborah Bartholdi Switzerland	19	911 1.1×	948 2.0×	933 2.9×	153 0.6×	476 1.9×	38	2.7k
Desirée L. Salazar United States	7	692 0.9×	678 1.5×	519 1.6×	170 0.6×	520 2.0×	7	1.5k
Zhen Guan United States	25	1.5k 1.9×	983 2.1×	589 1.9×	248 0.9×	526 2.1×	67	2.9k
Amilton Antunes Barreira Brazil	25	615 0.8×	339 0.7×	481 1.5×	512 1.9×	43 0.2×	93	1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Maria J. Crowe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Maria J. Crowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria J. Crowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria J. Crowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Maria J. Crowe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria J. Crowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria J. Crowe. The network helps show where Maria J. Crowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria J. Crowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria J. Crowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria J. Crowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria J. Crowe. Maria J. Crowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Zhang, Zhiying, Dennis J. Maiman, Shekar N. Kurpad, Maria J. Crowe, & Arshak R. Alexanian. (2011). Feline Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Express Several Pluripotent and Neural Markers and Easily Turn into Neural-Like Cells by Manipulation with Chromatin Modifying Agents and Neural Inducing Factors. Cellular Reprogramming. 13(5). 385–390. 11 indexed citations

Alexanian, Arshak R., Clive N. Svendsen, Maria J. Crowe, & Shekar N. Kurpad. (2010). Transplantation of human glial-restricted neural precursors into injured spinal cord promotes functional and sensory recovery without causing allodynia. Cytotherapy. 13(1). 61–68. 27 indexed citations

Stemper, Brian D., et al.. (2007). New Rat Model for Diffuse Brain Injury Using Coronal Plane Angular Acceleration. Journal of Neurotrauma. 24(8). 1387–1398. 47 indexed citations

Crowe, Maria J., et al.. (2006). Transplantation of Fibroblasts that Overexpress Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 into the Site of Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. Journal of Neurotrauma. 23(12). 1750–1765. 21 indexed citations

Crowe, Maria J., et al.. (2006). Matrix metalloproteinases and proteoglycans in axonal regeneration. Experimental Neurology. 204(2). 496–511. 57 indexed citations

Alexanian, Arshak R., Maria J. Crowe, & Shekar N. Kurpad. (2005). Efficient differentiation and integration of lineage-restricted neural precursors in the traumatically injured adult cat spinal cord. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 150(1). 41–46. 15 indexed citations

Crowe, Maria J., et al.. (2003). Exposure to Pulsed Magnetic Fields Enhances Motor Recovery in Cats After Spinal Cord Injury. Spine. 28(24). 2660–2666. 36 indexed citations

Crowe, Maria J., Thomas Doetschman, & David G. Greenhalgh. (2000). Delayed Wound Healing in Immunodeficient TGF-β1 Knockout Mice. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 115(1). 3–11. 166 indexed citations

Atit, Radhika P., Maria J. Crowe, David G. Greenhalgh, Richard Wenstrup, & Nancy Ratner. (1999). The Nf1 Tumor Suppressor Regulates Mouse Skin Wound Healing, Fibroblast Proliferation, and Collagen Deposited by Fibroblasts. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 112(6). 835–842. 88 indexed citations

10.

Crowe, Maria J., et al.. (1999). Medicinal yeast extracts. Cell Stress and Chaperones. 4(3). 171–171. 12 indexed citations

11.

Crowe, Maria J., et al.. (1999). Topical Application of Yeast Extract Accelerates the Wound Healing of Diabetic Mice. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation. 20(2). 155–162. 16 indexed citations

12.

Crowe, Maria J., et al.. (1997). Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys. Nature Medicine. 3(1). 73–76. 978 indexed citations breakdown →

13.

Crowe, Maria J., Todd J. Brown, Jacqueline C. Bresnahan, & Michael S. Beattie. (1995). Distribution of NADPH-diaphorase reactivity in the spinal cord of metamorphosing and adult Xenopus laevis. Developmental Brain Research. 86(1-2). 155–166. 29 indexed citations

14.

Crowe, Maria J. & Sarah K. Pixley. (1992). Species differences in amphibian olfactory neuron reactivity to a monoclonal antibody. Brain Research Bulletin. 28(5). 785–788. 1 indexed citations

15.

Crowe, Maria J. & Sarah K. Pixley. (1991). Monoclonal antibody to carnosine synthetase identifies a subpopulation of frog olfactory receptor neurons. Brain Research. 538(1). 147–151. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact