Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys
- Journal
- Nature Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nm0197-73 →Countries where authors are citing Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys
This map shows the geographic impact of Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys
This network shows the impact of Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys.
About Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys
This paper, published in 1997, received 978 indexed citations . Written by Maria J. Crowe, Jacqueline C. Bresnahan and Michael S. Beattie covering the research area of Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine (737 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (355 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (211 citations). Published in Nature Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nm0197-73.